Journalism of Courage
Premium

Hindenburg row: Supreme Court verdict today on pleas seeking to probe Adani

A three-judge bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra had reserved its decision on the petitions on November 24, 2023.

Adani Hindenburg reportOn March 2 this year, the top court set up a six-member expert committee to “investigate if there was a regulatory failure in dealing with the alleged contravention of laws pertaining to the securities market in relation to the Adani Group or other companies”. (File)
Advertisement

The Supreme Court will deliver on Wednesday its judgement on petitions seeking probe into allegations against Adani group of companies in a report published by US-based short seller Hindenburg research in February last year.

A three-judge bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra had reserved its decision on the petitions on November 24, 2023.

Hearing the petitions, the SC had in March 2023 asked the Securities and Exchange Bureau (SEBI) to continue the probe initiated in the wake of the report published by Hindenburg research on Adani group of companies ans to examine “whether there was any manipulation of stock prices in contravention of existing laws”.

The SC also set up a committee under its former judge Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre “for the assessment of the extant regulatory framework and for making recommendations to strengthen it” so as “to protect Indian investors against volatility of the kind which has been witnessed in the recent past”.

The other members of the expert committee areude former SBI chairman O P Bhat, former Bombay High Court judge Justice J P Devadhar, former chairman of Infosys K V Kamath, former chairman of UIDAI and Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilakeni, and Advocate Somasekhar Sundaresan (subsequently elevated as HC judge).

The expert committee in its report said that “no coherent pattern of abusive trading” of stocks by the Adani group “has come to light”.

SEbI in its status report said it is still gathering details pertaining to “economic interest shareholders” of 12 Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) which are public shareholders of the Adani Group companies. This investigation was to find if there has been a violation of Section 19A of the Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, which stipulates minimum 25% public shareholding in listed companies.

Story continues below this ad

Reserving its order, the bench had disputed the petitioner’s contention that the Hindenburg report is “credible” and said it cannot make such an assumption.

“As a court, how do we treat it as credible? We will have to rely on our investigating agencies to investigate… Therefore, we have to ask our investigative agencies to probe those allegations. You called it a credible investigation. But honestly, we can’t make that assumption that it’s either credible or lacking in credibility”, the CJI had said.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • adani group supreme court
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Smoke & MirrorsThere’s a new 'M' factor in Bihar elections: Mahila, will it counter Nitish fatigue?
X