‘There cannot be uprooting of 50,000 people in 7 days’: SC stays Uttarakhand HC’s Haldwani eviction order
Issuing notice to the railways and state of Uttarakhand, the Supreme Court said that a ‘workable arrangement is necessary’, along with rehabilitation schemes, ‘while recognising the need of the railways’.
People rejoicing the Supreme Court's verdict staying the order of the Uttarakhand HC evicting people living on land claimed by the railways in Haldwani. (Express)
Advertisement
Listen to this articleYour browser does not support the audio element.
The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the Uttarakhand High Court direction to forthwith evict people living on land claimed by the railways in Haldwani saying they cannot be uprooted overnight and some rehabilitation scheme is necessary for those claiming legal rights in the land.
“The moot point to be considered is whether the complete land is to vest in the railways or whether the state government is claiming a part of the land. Apart from that, there are issues of occupants claiming rights in the land as lessees/auction purchasers. We are on the way the order has been passed as there cannot be uprooting of 50,000 people in 7 days. We do believe that a workable arrangement is necessary to segregate people who may have no rights in the land who will have to be removed, coupled with schemes of rehabilitation which may already exist while recognising the need of the railways,” a bench of Justices S K Kaul and A S Oka said after hearing petitions challenging the high court order.
You have exhausted your monthly limit of free stories.
Read more stories for free with an Express account.
Issuing notice to the railways and state of Uttarakhand, the court also directed that there shall be complete restraint on further constructions on the land, whether by existing occupants or by others.
Taking up petitions filed against the high court order, the bench asked whether the demarcation had been done as to how much land belonged to railways and how much to the state.
Appearing for the railways, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati submitted that it had been done. She added that the issue is not an overnight one and that the due process had been followed.
Over 4,000 families have been served eviction notices and given seven days to vacate the area, following an order to that effect issued by the Uttarakhand High Court. (Source: Twitter/@ShayarImran)
The court, however, said there may be instances of people who have purchased land there in auction etc.
“People were staying for so many years, some rehabilitation must be there,” said Justice Kaul, adding that asking people to clear up in seven days may not be appropriate.
Story continues below this ad
The ASG pointed out that the issue has been going on for a long time and is being projected in a manner that the state and railways have conflicting stances. “State and railways are on the same page,” she submitted.
The bench said “what is troubling us is how do you deal” with people who may have purchased in auction or claim rights in the land.
People have been living there for 60-70 years and some rehabilitation has to be there, the court said. The ASG responded that there are schemes for rehabilitation and they have to apply but the people were saying it is their land.
“There must be a culmination to this issue one way or the other…If we keep expanding, the whole thing will go on…We have to see… maybe all of them cannot be painted with the same brush, maybe some of them have no right…There is a human angle to it. You have to work out something,” Justice Kaul said. “We are trying to find out a solution, this is a human issue…that arises from a long period of occupation,” he added.
Story continues below this ad
The bench added that it was also conscious of the needs of the railways. “We also don’t want you to be put to difficulty…In harmony, two things can occur,” the bench said.
Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry.
He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More