Delhi excise policy case: SC to deliver verdict today on Arvind Kejriwal’s pleas seeking bail, challenging arrest
The CBI had opposed Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s pleas, telling the Supreme Court that witnesses from Goa would turn hostile if he walked out of jail.
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal Kejriwal was first arrested by the ED on March 21 in the money laundering case linked to the excise case. (Express Archives)
Advertisement
The Supreme Court will deliver on September 13 its verdict on Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s petitions seeking bail and challenging the upholding of his arrest in the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) case in connection with the alleged Delhi excise policy scam.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan had reserved its judgment on the matter on September 5. The SC’s cause list for Friday shows that there will be two judgments in the matter, one by Justice Kant and another by Justice Bhuyan.
You have exhausted your monthly limit of free stories.
Read more stories for free with an Express account.
Opposing the plea, the CBI had told the Supreme Court that witnesses from Goa, including those who contested the Assembly elections on an Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) ticket, would turn hostile if Kejriwal walked out of jail.
Kejriwal has filed two separate petitions challenging the denial of bail and against his arrest by the CBI in the case. He has challenged the August 5 order of the Delhi High Court upholding his arrest.
The central probe agency said that there is also a Punjab angle to the matter and that the ruling AAP government in the state is not granting permission to probe it and said that Kejriwal “is influencing the non-granting of permission”.
In the trial court last month, the CBI had claimed that a big chunk of the bribe money from the excise policy scam was used by AAP in the Goa Assembly polls in 2022.
“There are a number of witnesses (in the case) including Aam Aadmi Party candidates in Goa who stood for the elections, persons who took the money, and which was distributed in Goa,” the CBI said. “They never came to give statements as long as he was not arrested. After he was arrested, they gave statements. They were avoiding giving statements. Now, after he comes out, all those witnesses will turn hostile,” the CBI further submitted.
Story continues below this ad
Explaining the Punjab angle, the CBI said, “There is a distributor called Mahadev Liquors. He had a wholesale licence, but he was not willing to pay the bribes or part of the bribe. So there was arm-twisting… Excise offices with ulterior motives closed down his distilleries in Punjab. So when he went to the excise department (and asked) why have you closed down, why have you passed an order shutting down my distilleries, he was told your problem doesn’t lie here, your problem lies in Delhi… Finally, he surrendered his licence. The moment he surrendered his wholesale licence, permission was granted to restart the distilleries… The CBI wanted to investigate that angle…”.
Appearing for Kejriwal, Senior Advocate A M Singhvi said that the AAP leader, being “a constitutional functionary, cannot be a flight risk” and that there is no risk of tampering with the evidence which is documentary in nature and has already been collected.
Singhvi also referred to what the Supreme Court said while granting bail to former Delhi deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia in the excise policy cases. The court, he pointed out, had said, “Now, relegating the appellant (Sisodia) to again approach the trial court and thereafter the High Court and only thereafter this Court, in our view, would be making him play a game of “Snake and Ladder”.”
Kejriwal was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21 in the money laundering case linked to the excise case. On June 26, he was formally arrested by the CBI in the corruption case linked to the alleged scam. He was granted interim bail by the Supreme Court in the money laundering case on July 12 and is currently in judicial custody in the CBI’s corruption case.
Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry.
He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More