Journalism of Courage
Premium

Supreme Court refuses to interfere in ‘Arikomban’ translocation, dismisses Kerala appeal

The high court on April 5 directed that the animal be captured, radio-collared and translocated to the Parambikulam Tiger Reserve, after a “unanimous” recommendation of an expert committee.

2 min read
sc elephantIn the Supreme Court, the state said it wanted to capture the animal, study it and then leave it, but the bench did not agree. (Representational)
Advertisement
Listen to this article Your browser does not support the audio element.

The Supreme Court Monday refused to interfere with the Kerala High Court direction to translocate the wild tusker known as ‘Arikomban’ from the Munnar-Chinnakanal area in the Idukki district to the Parambikulam Tiger Reserve in the Palakkad district.

Dismissing an appeal filed by the Kerala government against the high court order, a three-judge bench, presided by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, noted that an expert committee made the recommendation to translocate the animal.

“You have experts. Your experts have made a recommendation. The state government can’t now also sit and say it will do something over and above it,” the bench, comprising Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala, said, adding that “we will not interfere”.

The high court on April 5 directed that the animal be captured, radio-collared and translocated to the Parambikulam Tiger Reserve. This followed the “unanimous” recommendation of the expert committee set up by it. This led to protests by local residents in the Parambikulam area. Though a review petition was filed against the April 5 order, the high court dismissed it.

In the Supreme Court, the state said it wanted to capture the animal, study it and then leave it, but the bench did not agree.

In March, the high court stayed the state government’s order to tranquilise and capture ‘Arikomban’, which has been terrorising the high ranges of the Idukki district by killing people and raiding shops for grains for at least the last five years. The court later warned the state of strict action if it found that the area in the Idukki district where the tusker was roaming had been an elephant habitat before tribal people were resettled there.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Kerala supreme court
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express PremiumIn GST 2.0 calculus, behavioural nudges — packaged foods to ACs
X