Journalism of Courage
Premium

Police opposes in Delhi High Court perjury plea against ex-JNUSU President

In his plea, petitioner Prashant Kumar Umrao has contended that the professor had wrongly vouched on oath that Kanhaiya was not involved in any "anti-national activity" and that he was a man of proper conduct.

JNU, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi High Court, Kanhaiya Kumar, Umar Khalid, third anniversary of Afzal Guru's hanging, Afzal Guru, Afzal Guru 2001 Parliament attack, JNU anti-India slogans, JNU 2016, India News, Indian Express Former JNUSU president Kanhaiya Kumar. (File Photo)
Advertisement

City police on Monday opposed in Delhi High Court a plea seeking initiation of perjury proceedings against former JNUSU President Kanhaiya Kumar and a JNU professor, saying there was no material to substantiate the allegation that they had filed false affidavits along with the bail plea of the student leader in a sedition case. Justice S P Garg was informed by the investigating officer (IO) that the court on August 11 had already dismissed pleas to cancel interim bail of Kanhaiya in the sedition case on the ground that nothing was shown that the student leader had made any anti-national speech after his release.

Watch what else is making news:

“Perusal of petition, under reply, lacks materials and the contents/averments made therein are vehemently denied and, in view of the order dated August 11, 2016 of this court, the petition deserves to dismissed,” the affidavit filed by the Delhi Police said.The reply of the police came in the backdrop of a court notice issued to it on a plea claiming that a JNU professor had “deliberately” filed a false affidavit in the high court along with the bail petition of Kanhaiya in the case.

The court has now fixed the matter for further hearing on February 23 next year. In his plea, petitioner Prashant Kumar Umrao has contended that the professor had wrongly vouched on oath that Kanhaiya was not involved in any “anti-national activity” and that he was a man of proper conduct. Advocate R P Luthra, appearing for the petitioner, had said the professor should have been aware that the student leader was fined for inappropriate conduct on campus a year ago and there was nothing to show that he was not involved in any anti-national sloganeering.

From the homepage

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Quantum frontiers to Life 2.0Meet the 14 young scientists shaping India’s scientific future
X