Journalism of Courage
Premium

No objections received on Nicobar infra project, says Minister; sent in 2022: Tribal council chief

Speaking during Question Hour, Oram said the project — involving construction of a transshipment port, an airport, a gas power plant and tourism infrastructure – was in national interest and will not have any “environmental impact nor displace any tribals.” 

Vishvajit Pandya, Jual Oram, Nicobar infra project, Great Nicobar Infrastructure project, Rajya Sabha, Indian express news, current affairsUnion Minister Jual Oram speaks in Rajya Sabha. (ANI)
Advertisement

The government has not received any information about objections to the Great Nicobar Infrastructure project — either raised by the tribal council of Great Nicobar Islands or documented in a video report by anthropologist Vishvajit Pandya — Union Tribal Affairs minister Jual Oram said in Rajya Sabha Wednesday.

Speaking during Question Hour, Oram said the project — involving construction of a transshipment port, an airport, a gas power plant and tourism infrastructure – was in national interest and will not have any “environmental impact nor displace any tribals.”  “When the tsunami happened (in 2004), because the area was low-lying, they (the tribal communities) had problems and moved out. That they have objections, we have not received such information,” Oram said in response to a question by TMC’s Saket Gokhale.

“Nobody will get displaced, only 7.144 sq km of tribal reserve land will be used, rest is forest land… there are no objections, as he (Gokhale) is referring to, and the Gram Sabha has also agreed to it and passed it.”

On a video report about the Shompen and Nicobarese communities’ opposition, documented by Pandya who was part of the Andaman and Nicobar administration’s committee tasked with assessing the project, Oram said, “I do not have this video report of such opposition. If he can submit it, we will examine it.”

When contacted, Barnabas Manju, chairman, tribal council of Great Nicobar and Little Nicobar Island told The Indian Express that a letter revoking the council’s NOC and to forest diversion for the project was sent to Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Union Environment Ministry and Ministry of Home Affairs on November 22, 2022.

“Denotification of the tribal reserve will pose problems for us. We had sent the revocation letter to several ministries and had also pointed it out to then tribal affairs Arjun Munda during his visit to the island in May 2023,” he said.

In an April 12, 2024 letter to the Tribal Ministry and the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST), which was probing a complaint on violation of tribal rights due to the project, Pandya, a distinguished professor at the Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology, Gandhinagar, had pointed out his video was not taken on record by the island administration.

Story continues below this ad

The tribal council had revoked its NOC to the denotification of 84.1 sq km of tribal reserve and diversion of 130.75 sq km of forests, alleging that it was done without seeking consent of indigenous inhabitants of the island and by concealing important information. The letter, dated November 22, 2022, also stated that crucial information regarding occupation of the ancestral lands was not revealed.

Explained
The Great Nicobar project

The project, which according to the Govt will cost `81,834 crore, includes a port, airport, power plant, trunk infrastructure for a township, besides estimated budgets for wildlife conservation plan, compensatory afforestation, tribal welfare plans, conservation steps and mitigation measures.

Gokhale had sought to know what action the Ministry of Tribal Affairs had taken on a letter of the tribal council, the impact of the project on the Shompen tribe and the Nicobarese Scheduled Tribe community, and their demand to return to their native lands where they forage and have plantations. He also sought to know whether Pandya’s video report was recorded by the committee.

Meanwhile, to Gokhale’s question on the action taken on the concerns raised by the National Green Tribunal and the NCST regarding the impact of the project on the local tribal communities, Oram said he cannot respond as the matter is

sub-judice.

Taking objection to this, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh said that as per a 21 July, 2023 ruling of the Rajya Sabha Chairman, only matters related to the conduct of a Supreme Court and High Court judge cannot be discussed under Article 121.

Story continues below this ad

“I request that an answer be given at a subsequent date, because the Great Nicobar project is a recipe for environmental and humanitarian disaster,” he said.

An award-winning journalist with 14 years of experience, Nikhil Ghanekar is an Assistant Editor with the National Bureau [Government] of The Indian Express in New Delhi. He primarily covers environmental policy matters which involve tracking key decisions and inner workings of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. He also covers the functioning of the National Green Tribunal and writes on the impact of environmental policies on wildlife conservation, forestry issues and climate change. Nikhil joined The Indian Express in 2024. Originally from Mumbai, he has worked in publications such as Tehelka, Hindustan Times, DNA Newspaper, News18 and Indiaspend. In the past 14 years, he has written on a range of subjects such as sports, current affairs, civic issues, city centric environment news, central government policies and politics. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Rajya Sabha
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Long ReadsDevice used to scare monkeys became a Diwali rage in Bhopal. Then came the eye injuries
X