Journalism of Courage
Premium

Retain sedition law with key amendments, recommends Law Commission

In its report submitted to the government, the panel said cognizant of the views on the misuse of Section 124A, it recommends that model guidelines curbing them be issued by the Centre.

Sedition lawThe Commission said sedition being a "colonial legacy" is not a valid ground for its repeal.
Advertisement
Listen to this article Your browser does not support the audio element.

With a view to preventing any “alleged misuse” of the provision, the Law Commission of India has proposed retaining the law of sedition with key amendments.

“Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in lndia, with a tendency to incite violence or cause public disorder shall be punished with imprisonment for life, to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, to which fine may be added, or with fine,” the Commission proposed in its 279th report.

The Commission is currently headed by former Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi. The report stated that the home ministry referred the issue to the Commission in 2016.

The qualifying words “tendency to incite violence”, the Commission said, would mean “mere inclination to incite violence or cause public disorder rather than proof of actual violence or imminent threat to violence”.

Currently, Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with sedition, has a punishment of a life sentence along with a fine or imprisonment which may extend up to three years along with a fine. The criticism against the provision is that it gives wide and arbitrary discretion to courts on punishment.

In July last year, the Supreme Court stayed the operation of the law on sedition after the government said that it will take a relook at the colonial provision. Former Chief Justice of India N V Ramana expressed concerns about the misuse of the law. In 1962, in the Kedarnath Singh ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the provision, restricting the application of the law to those who incite violence.

“The Law Commission is of the considered view that Section l24A needs to be retained in the Indian Penal Code, though certain amendments, as suggested, may be introduced in it by incorporating the rotio decidendi of Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar [AIR 1962 SC 9551] so as to bring about greater clarity regarding the usage of the provision. We further recommend that the scheme of punishment provided under the said section be amended to ensure that it is brought in parity with the other offences under Chapter VI of IPC,” the Commission said.

Story continues below this ad

“Moreover, cognizant of the views regarding the misuse of Section 124A, the Commission recommends that model guidelines curbing the same be issued by the Central Government. In this context, it is also alternatively suggested that a provision analogous to Section 196(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) may be incorporated as a proviso to Section 154 of CrPC, which would provide the requisite procedural safeguard before filing of a FIR with respect to an offence under Section l24A of IPC,” the Commission said.

Apurva Vishwanath is the National Legal Editor of The Indian Express in New Delhi. She graduated with a B.A., LL. B (Hons) from Dr Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She joined the newspaper in 2019 and in her current role, oversees the newspapers coverage of legal issues. She also closely tracks judicial appointments. Prior to her role at the Indian Express, she has worked with ThePrint and Mint. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • sedition
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express ExplainedWhy rare earths are at the heart of a renewed China-US trade slugfest
X