Journalism of Courage
Premium

Supreme Court recalls notice to Arunachal Pradesh Governor Jyoti Prasad Rajkhowa

The Supreme Court on Monday conceded its "mistake" and recalled its notice issued to Arunachal Pradesh Governor Jyoti Prasad Rajkhowa in cases arising out of imposition of President's Rule in the political crisis-hit hill state.

Delhi, Delhi judiciary exam, Delhi judiciary exam result, delhi judiciary exam, Delhi Judicial Services Exam, 2014 Delhi Judicial Services Exam, 2014 Delhi judiciary exam result, Delhi Judicial Services Exam court order, Delhi news
Advertisement

Noting that the Governor enjoyed complete immunity in court proceedings, the Supreme Court Monday recalled its notice issued to Arunachal Pradesh Governor J P Rajkhowa in a clutch of appeals against the imposition of President’s Rule in the state.

A Constitution Bench led by Justice J S Khehar ordered for recall of the notice issued on January 27 after considering an apex court verdict and the legal position, as Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi relied on the 2006 judgment, which had held that Governors cannot be asked to join legal proceedings since they had immunity under Article 361.

The bench, also comprising Justices Dipak Misra, Madan B Lokur, P C Ghose and N V Ramana, clarified that this order would not preclude the Arunachal Governor from filing his counter-affidavit or putting forth his views before it.

The issue came up as the bench issued notices to the Centre on fresh petitions filed by former CM Nabam Tuki and the former deputy chief whip in the Assembly and Rohatgi pointed out that the Governor does not have to be issued notices in view of the settled legal position.

The bench also directed the Governor’s office and the Chief Secretary to provide copies of all documents and records, including those in hard drives, to Tuki and other Congress leaders who are petitioners in the case. These records were seized on orders of the Governor on January 26.

“Basic fairness requires they should be given all documents so that they can effectively respond. Allow them to fight their battles,” the bench told Rohatgi. “We are not interfering with the decision to suspend the Assembly or seize documents. Nobody will work till an eventual decision is taken.”

Not willing to share all documents, Rohatgi said the Congress leaders must specify which documents they need. “These are all government documents. Nothing personal has been seized… It is not a genuine request,” he added.

Story continues below this ad

Appearing for the petitioners, senior lawyer Fali S Nariman said he is “shocked” by the Governor’s directive to seize the documents as if those involved are “criminals”. He also questioned how the Governor’s memorandum can state that the CM and ministers stand dismissed automatically after proclamation of Emergency.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Quantum frontiers to Life 2.0Meet the 14 young scientists shaping India’s scientific future
X