Journalism of Courage
Premium

Bombay High Court to hear woman constable’s sex change plea on November 27

Lalita Salve, born in June 1988, noticed changes in her body three years ago and underwent medical tests, wherein it was found that the presence of Y chromosome was more.

chandigarh false evidence case, chandigarh fabricated evidence case, chandigarh police, chandigarh district and sessions court, chandigarh news, cities news, Indian ExpressA Supreme Court bench met the chiefs of the CBI, Intelligence Bureau and Delhi Police and said the charges were “highly sensitive”, “if true were very serious” and will need further investigation.
Advertisement

The Bombay High Court today posted for hearing on November 27 a petition filed by a 28-year-old woman police constable in Beed district, seeking direction to Maharashtra Director General of Police (DGP) to grant her leave to undergo a sex change surgery.

Lalita Salve, who now prefers to be called Lalit, had sought a month’s leave to undergo the sex reassignment surgery, but the request was refused by Beed police authorities, following which she petitioned the high court.

Salve’s lawyer Ejaz Naqvi today mentioned the petition before a division bench of Justices S M Kemkar and G S Kulkarni, which posted it for hearing on November 27.

As per the petition, Salve, born in June 1988, noticed changes in her body three years ago and underwent medical tests, wherein it was found that the presence of Y chromosome was more.

“The petitioner later undertook counseling sessions with psychiatrists at the state-run J J Hospital. The doctors found that she had gender dysphoria abnormality and advised her to undergo sex reassignment surgery, if she was willing to and was of sound mind,” the petition said.

Salve approached senior police officials and sought a month’s medical leave to undergo the surgery.

“Last week, the superintendent of police (SP) of Beed district informed the petitioner that she cannot undergo sex reassignment surgery and refused to grant her leave,” the petition said.

Story continues below this ad

The said decision was violative of the petitioner’s fundamental rights, the petition contended.

From the homepage

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Mumbai
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express PremiumSimilarities in Haryana IPS and ASI suicides: A ‘final note’, shot in head, no eyewitness
X