Journalism of Courage

2020 Delhi riots case: SC to hear bail pleas of accused Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulshifa Fathima, others on Sept 19

The Delhi HC rejected the bail pleas of the accused, including Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulshifa Fathima, and Meeran Haider, saying the 2020 Delhi riots were not a “regular protest” but a “premeditated, well-orchestrated conspiracy”.

Supreme Court Umar Khalid SCTheir appeals challenging the September 2 Delhi High Court order denying them bail in the case was listed Friday before a bench of Justices Arvind Kumar and N V Anjaria. (Express Photo)
Advertisement

The Supreme Court will hear pleas by the accused in the 2020 Delhi riots case, including Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulshifa Fathima, and Meeran Haider, seeking bail on September 19.

Their appeals challenging the September 2 Delhi High Court order denying them bail in the case was listed Friday before a bench of Justices Arvind Kumar and N V Anjaria. However, the court pointed out that the supplementary list by which the case was listed reached it very late, at 2.30 am, indicating that it did not have enough time to go through the files.

The Delhi High Court rejected the bail pleas of nine accused in the case, including Khalid, Imam, Fathima and Haider, saying the riots, which killed 29 people and injured hundreds, were not a “regular protest” but a “premeditated, well-orchestrated conspiracy”.

The others who were denied relief are Athar Khan, Abdul Khalid Saifi, Mohd Saleem Khan, Shifa-ur-Rehman, and Shadab Ahmed.

“….in the conspectus of the allegations levelled, it emerges that the role of the appellants – Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid – is prima facie grave in the entire conspiracy, having delivered inflammatory speeches on communal lines to instigate a mass mobilisation of members of the Muslim community,” the Delhi High Court said.

Drawing a line on the limits of right to protest vis-a-vis the right to freedom of speech, the HC said, “If the exercise of an unfettered right to protest were permitted, it would damage the constitutional framework and impinge upon the law-and-order situation in the country”.

“Any conspiratorial violence under the garb of protests or demonstrations by the citizens cannot be permitted. Such actions must be regulated and checked by the state machinery, as they do not fall within the ambit of the freedom of speech, expression, and association.”

Story continues below this ad

Three other accused — Natasha Narwal, Devangana Kalita and Asif Iqbal Tanha — were granted bail by the Delhi High Court in June 2021, while a fourth accused and former Congress councillor, Ishrat Jahan, was granted bail in March 2022.

From the homepage

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • supreme court Umar Khalid
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Big PictureThe rage and rampage: Why are Nepal's youth angry?
X