Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
The Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) group headed by Maharashtra’s Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar on Monday claimed that since the key appointments within the NCP, prior to June 30, did not follow the party’s constitution and were ‘unconstitutional nominations’, it would mean that the electoral majority will decide who gets hold of the party and its symbol.
“We have 43 MLAs in Maharashtra supporting us as of today. Besides, six out of the nine MLCs are supporting us…. While we believe in the principle of majority, it should be noted that the party can function only within the constitutional parameters of its own constitution. We never had our internal elections as per the constitution of the party and so all the appointments prior to June 30 are unconstitutional appointments. Therefor the only test, based on which the Election Commission (of India) can decide (to whom the party belongs to), is of elected representatives,” said Ajit Pawar group’s national working president Praful Patel.
Patel was addressing a press conference along with Ajit Pawar group’s state party president and Lok Sabha MP Sunil Tatkare. At the event, all the seven NCP MLAs from Nagaland along with the party state chief, women wing and youth wing chief extended support to Ajit Pawar.
Recalling the letter extending support to the NDA’s Nagaland government, written in March, Patel said that, that was the time when the NCP had joined the NDA.
Following the rebellion by Ajit Pawar against his uncle and NCP chief Sharad Pawar on July 2, the former has staked claim on the party name and symbol. The rebel group has claimed in front of the Election Commission of India (ECI) that on June 30, Ajit was made the chief of the party, replacing Sharad Pawar. The ECI is set to hear the arguments of both sides on October 6.
Prior to these arguments, the Ajit group is attempting to make a claim that only a majority in electoral representation is sufficient to stake claim on the party since the organisational appointments are unconstitutional. Meanwhile, both groups have filed disqualification petitions against the MLAs of each side.
The Rajya Sabha MP stressed that the party never had internal elections as mandated by the party constitution. “The presidents, including Jayant Patil, have been nominated and not elected. Organisational appointments need to be through election. We have no such records of internal elections. Since we did not have elections, the selection of delegates (to party conference) is also questionable. Therefore, those delegates choosing anyone are under scanner. The decision on who the party belongs to has to be through elected representatives as there are no internal elections to choose office-bearers,” he said.
The Ajit group stressed that the present case is different from the one of Chief Minister Eknath Shinde. Shinde after rebelling against former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray staked claim on the party name and symbol and the ECI gave the verdict in his favour.
When asked if the party will contest Assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan, Patel said that ECI’s order is likely to come within 15-20 days from October 6 and “we can talk about this after that”. “I don’t know what the order would be. But I can surely tell you all that we have studied all the factors of this case and we are confident of winning it,” he said.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram