Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

No aid for minor rape victim as cops fail to add Sec 376 in FIR

Bombay HC tells lower court to not take congisance of case closure report, asks state if victim eligible for Manodhairya aid.

Justice RC Gandhi, RC Gandhi controversy, Rajashtan high court, jammu and kashmir high court, high court judge in controversy

A seven-year-old girl abducted and raped in 2012 found no mention in the police records after the police failed to record Section 376 (rape) of the IPC in the FIR. A “shocked” Bombay High Court asked the police Thursday to add the charge and asked the government if the victim was eligible for the state-sponsored Manodhairya scheme.

“We are shocked that Section 376 was not added in the FIR,” Justices Ranjit More and Rajesh Ketkar told the state government after noting that the police applied only Section 363 (kidnapping).

[related-post]

The victim’s the parents had abandoned her soon after they learnt that she had been sexually assaulted, leaving her with her grandmother. The victim is now in the custody of the Child Welfare Committee (CWC), which referred her to an NGO on February 24, 2015.

The case suffered a major setback after the police, which failed to arrest the accused, filed a closure report in a magistrate court saying there was no headway, even as the accused was still at large. The grandmother then decided to approach the High Court. In her petition filed in the HC, she has given a description of the girl’s ordeal as well as her plight as she had to bear expenses incurred on the girl’s treatment without any monetary help from the government.

The girl had gone out with her grandmother to get water from a common tap in the locality when a stranger allegedly kidnapped her. The petition says her injuries were so severe that they resulted in a “third degree perineal tear”. The petition also blames two hospitals for not informing the police about their findings after treating the victim. “Neither the doctors of Sir J J Hospital, nor Nagpada Police Hospital made an attempt to inform the Shivaji Nagar police station about the findings and treatment given to the victim,” says the grandmother.

In fact, on examination of the girl’s injuries and the treatment given to her, a medical expert opined, “The nature of her injuries and condition were critical enough to have caused severe infection and lifelong morbidity and complication.”

Given the severity of the assault, the victim had to undergo two major operations costing the grandmother Rs 3 lakh. This, despite the case being covered under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, and qualifying for the Manodhairya scheme, says the grandmother.

Story continues below this ad

She has now sought the HC’s directions to the police to nab the accused besides to the government to provide her monetary support.

For now, the magistrate court has been directed to not take cognisance of the police’s closure report until the next hearing when the state will also have to inform if any relief could be given.

aamir.khan@expressindia.com

Aamir Khan is Head-Legal Project, Indian Express digital and is based in New Delhi. Before joining Indianexpress.com, he worked with Press Trust of India as News Editor, editing legal stories from the Supreme Court and various High Courts. He also worked as an Associate Editor with Bar and Bench, where he led long-form storytelling, ran series on crucial and interesting legal issues, conducted exclusive interviews and wrote deep-dive stories. He has worked for the Indian Express print between 2013 and 2016, when he covered law in Mumbai and Delhi. Aamir holds an LLB degree, PG Diploma in Journalism (New Media) and a Bachelor's in Life Sciences and Chemistry. You can reach him at: aamir.khan@indianexpress.com. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Bombay High Court minor rape
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Bihar Elections 2025Prashant Kishor frames an angry Bihari campaign but on the ground, is aam aadmi that angry?
X