Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

HC refuses to interfere with ban on women’s entry into Haji Ali sanctum

Justices S C Dharmadhikari and S P Deshmukh said there were several places of worship where women’s entry was forbidden.

How can a court interfere into an individual’s right to practise religion, asked Bombay High Court (HC) while hearing a PIL challenging the ban on women from entering the inner sanctum (mazaar) of Haji Ali Dargah.

Justices S C Dharmadhikari and S P Deshmukh said there were several places of worship like mosques, temples where women were forbidden but such places do not warrant a mandate or sanction from the court.

“In so many religious places like mosques and temples women are forbidden but no court has interfered. How can the court act legally? It goes out of the court’s premises,” HC said.

Unless, the court clarified, prayers in mosques were being offered in such a manner that someone’s rights were being violated, the court cannot interfere in this issue.

Noorjehan Niaz and Zakia Soman of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan have challenged the ban saying they experienced the restriction, which was imposed somewhere between March 2011-June 2012.

The court asked the petitioners to satisfy the court on whether there are judgments and legal points favouring the petitioners’ case. However, it expressed how could something which was essential and integral to the rights of one individual merit HC’s intervention.

“Legal issues raised by the court should be satisfied. Whether court can interfere in matter of individual right to worship,” the HC said.

Story continues below this ad

The petitioners said they never faced hurdles while accessing the inner sanctum but now there is a barricade. According to the PIL, a trustee in July 2012 told them the decision was taken for the safety and security of women and is based on Sharia provisions, but eventually realised it was sheer discrimination.

The PIL says if Sharia says something that is contrary to the principles enshrined in the Constitution of India, it is the Constitution alone which, as the supreme law of the land, should prevail over contravening personal laws.

In reply to the PIL, the trustee of the shrine says the stand is a result of the “advice” of scholars for segregating men and women in places of worship so that sexual harassment of women is abstained. In the affidavit, Masood Hasham Dada has further said that menstruating women bring disrespect if they attent religious rituals. “I state that dargahs, temples, churches, gurdwaras, etc., are sacred and divine places, and, therefore, one should exercise some rules to respect them.”

Aamir Khan is Head-Legal Project, Indian Express digital and is based in New Delhi. Before joining Indianexpress.com, he worked with Press Trust of India as News Editor, editing legal stories from the Supreme Court and various High Courts. He also worked as an Associate Editor with Bar and Bench, where he led long-form storytelling, ran series on crucial and interesting legal issues, conducted exclusive interviews and wrote deep-dive stories. He has worked for the Indian Express print between 2013 and 2016, when he covered law in Mumbai and Delhi. Aamir holds an LLB degree, PG Diploma in Journalism (New Media) and a Bachelor's in Life Sciences and Chemistry. You can reach him at email: aamir.khan@indianexpress.com. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Bombay High Court Haji Ali Dargah
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Yogendra Yadav writesFrom IPS officer to CJI — three incidents show caste isn't in our past
X