Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal has a plea pending before the Delhi High Court, seeking the quashing of a trial court order that took cognisance of a chargesheet filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) without prior sanction to prosecute him in the Delhi excise policy scam case.
Delhi L-G V K Saxena had recently recommended that the ED be granted sanction to prosecute Kejriwal in the excise case, officials from the L-G Secretariat said. As per the rules, the L-G can recommend to the Ministry of Home Affairs or the Government of India, which are the competent authorities in such an instance, to grant sanction for the prosecution of the Delhi CM.
The development, which comes after the trial court has taken cognisance of the ED chargesheet, will not change Kejriwal’s bail status, and cannot lead to his arrest, legal experts said. The protection granted shall continue.
Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (CrPC) bars courts from taking cognisance of offences alleged to have been committed by a judge, a magistrate, or a public servant who was “acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty” while committing the alleged offence, unless prior or “previous” sanction has been given by the government.
According to officials, the ED had sought permission on December 5 to prosecute the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convene, writing to Delhi Chief Secretary Dharmendra in his capacity as Chief Vigilance Officer.
On its part, the AAP claimed that there was no such sanction, accusing the ED of callousness in investigating the case in relation to which several senior leaders from the party were jailed, including Kejriwal and his former deputy Manish Sisodia.
Terming it an attempt to “politically malign the AAP government”, the party accused the agency of having “breached every procedural norm” and harassment in the name of investigation.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram