Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram
A Delhi court recently came down heavily on a petitioner belonging to a lower caste for the misuse of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act of 1989. Additional Sessions Judge Kamini Lau,in her judgment on a land dispute,said,Unfortunately one comes across growing instances of cases where the provisions of this Act have not been invoked for the betterment of those it seeks to protect,but by those who want to settle personal scores by giving to an otherwise ordinary dispute the colour of an alleged atrocity under the Act.
This court will not remain a mute spectator to any abuse of law and will not be a privy to any exploitative situation of misuse of this Act whose abuse has otherwise raised serious concerns all over the country.
Complainant SS Khemwal,a former senior officer in the Union Petroleum Ministry,had alleged that Ravinder Singh and his two brothers attempted to grab his land and tortured him in September 2007. Khemwal also indicted the Tehsildar and ex-Tehsildars of Narela for failing to perform their public duties. He invoked several provisions of the IPC,Delhi Land Reforms Act and the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
However,the court observed that the complainant was neither an owner nor transferee of the land. In fact,Singh had purchased the land in 2005. Khemwal contended that his father started cultivating it in 1990,alongwith the adjoining land which belonged to them,and since then owners of the land did not take care of it.
The court called the complainant and his father encroachers who have no right over the land. The provisions of this Special Legislation (SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989) cannot be invoked as a device to create and regularise a right where none exists, the court said.
The court also dismissed the allegations against public functionaries saying,Any attempt by a person to approach public officers under the threat of prosecution is nothing short of criminal intimidation and cannot be permitted.
In a verdict in April,the same judge had made similar observations on the Act. The court had noted that the complainant had changed her statement before the police and invoked the SC/ST Act against the relatives of her landlord after talking to her lawyer.
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram