Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

Can’t put everything on my head merely because I am a high functionary: Sisodia to HC

Mathur refers to statement of Dinesh following which he states that later, director of Buddy Retail Private Limited, Gurgaon, Amit Arora, who is a co-accused in the matter, made a statement that “Dinesh Arora told him this was being done at asking of Sisodia”.

Manish Sisodia, Sisodia bail plea, ED's money laundering probe, Delhi High Court, Dlhi excise policy, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, indian express, indian express newsFormer Delhi deputy CM Manish Sisodia (Express Photo)
Listen to this article Your browser does not support the audio element.

Former Delhi Deputy CM Manish Sisodia, while arguing his bail plea in the Enforcement Directorate’s money laundering probe into the now-scrapped excise policy, told Delhi High Court Monday that not everything can be “put on his head” merely because he is a “high functionary”.

Appearing for Sisodia, senior advocate Mohit Mathur submitted before a single-judge bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma: “Let us take their (ED’s) case which is that money has come from South Lobby. Who connects it to me? There is an approver in this CBI case, Dinesh Arora… He doesn’t say at any place that this money was sought at asking of Sisodia…it does not name me (Sisodia) at all.”

Mathur refers to statement of Dinesh following which he states that later, director of Buddy Retail Private Limited, Gurgaon, Amit Arora, who is a co-accused in the matter, made a statement that “Dinesh Arora told him this was being done at asking of Sisodia”.

Mathur said, “But Dinesh Arora doesn’t name anyone. At the worst, what is coming against me (Sisodia) by Amit Arora is hearsay because he is not a party to it.” Mathur said it was “crucial to understand” that Amit was on interim bail when he gave a “selective statement” that he was told by Dinesh about Sisodia’s alleged involvement in the matter.

There is no statement which says Sisodia was involved in any of the processes which Section 3 prescribes, Mathur said. Section 3 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act states whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with proceeds of crime and projecting it as untainted property shall be guilty of offence of money laundering.

On allegation that Vijay Nair, another accused, was a representative of Sisodia, Mathur argued, “Vijay Nair doesn’t say that…You can’t put everything on my head merely because I’m a high functionary… A minister using three phones over… three years… how does it imply culpability… My act ultimately should be connected with process… Nair’s statement doesn’t say anything against me.”

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Delhi Excise Policy Manish Sisodia
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express PremiumNow a security ‘threat’, Sonam Wangchuk was Govt’s expert for all seasons
X