Journalism of Courage
Advertisement
Premium

Express your voice

• Tavleen Singh’s indiscriminate criticism of Sonia Gandhi, in her column ‘‘Where is the inner voice now?’’ is...

.

• Tavleen Singh’s indiscriminate criticism of Sonia Gandhi, in her column ‘‘Where is the inner voice now?’’ is reflective of her bias. She holds Sonia responsible for the ills that have plagued us for decades. She alleges that the Congress president enjoys the position of the actual PM. She challenges her inner voice and accuses her of entertaining dignitaries from within and outside the country. She condemns her for allowing journalists and photographers to her door and suggests that she engineers these photo-sessions for publicity. This is malicious and offensive. The truth is that Sonia has never over-stepped her office to undermine that of any of her party colleagues — the PM included. She does not covet attention from either the media or visiting dignitaries. They flocked to her much before her days as an active party worker, in fact during those days when she was said to be media-shy. Tavleen cannot look upon this as a violation of the decree of her inner voice. Sonia is party president, but she does not possess a magic wand that can make the rot that has seeped into the veins of India disappear with the wave of her hand. Next, she’ll blame her for a failing monsoon.
Archana Dalmia

• Sonia’s ‘‘inner voice’’ does seem to have disappeared. One year is enough time to take stock of the functioning of any government. Perhaps it does not matter who the real PM is. What matters is that the government should function. And sadly, it is not doing so. First, decision-making is slow, as every matter has to be vetted by Sonia. Second, sycophancy rules Congress so an honest opinion is rare. Third, Manmohan Singh is too gentle to be assertive. Fourth, the UPA has compelling reasons to accommodate tainted ministers like Laloo Prasad Yadav.
Dr F S K Barar

• With reference to the report, ‘‘No head for numbers’’, VAT is welcome if all other taxes like are abolished. But the rates of 4% and 12.5% are too high and should be reduced to 2% and 5%. VAT should be uniformly applicable throughout India. Also there should no tax on necessities. In its public awareness advertisements, the government warns consumers not to pay anything over the Maximum Retail Price. But many times, the labels mention that the MRP is not inclusive of the local taxes. So, it is important that the MRP should include VAT and other taxes too, as consumers are not aware of the rates for different commodities. And is there a way to ensure that such extra taxes collected by retailers actually reach the government?
Mahesh Kumar

• This is with reference to an item in Soli Sorabjee’s column, ‘‘Commission of Inquiry Reports’’. After every communal riot, accident or scam, inquiry commissions are appointed, which usually make inordinate delays in submitting their reports. As observed by the SC, citizens have a fundamental right to know the contents of the report. But first of all, the report is not made public. If it is and the report goes against the ruling party, they reject the findings and appoint another Commission. However, if the report indicts its oponents, the ruling party extracts maximum political advantage. If such is the fate of the Inquiry Commission, what is the rationale behind appointing them?
Vedant Bhandari

Write to yourvoice@expressindia.com

Tags:
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Big PictureKhammam to Dallas, Jhansi to Seattle — chasing the American dream amid H-1B visa fee hike
X