Journalism of Courage
Premium

2G ‘scam’: Justice Shivaraj Patil rejects charge he agreed to post-retirement job under UPA

Jaitley made the allegation hours after a special court discharged former telecom secretary Shyamal Ghosh and three telecom firms in the 2002 additional spectrum allocation case, saying the chargesheet was full of distorted and fabricated facts.

Spectrum auction, Department of telecom, Spectrum auction in October, mobile frequencies auction, Tech news,A big-bang auction of spectrum in the 900, 1800 and 2100 MHz frequencies is expected in February.
Advertisement

Less than a week after Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley accused former Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal of selecting a retired judge of “his choice” to unearth an “NDA scam” in the Telecom sector, the judge is question — former Supreme Court Judge Shivaraj Patil — on Wednesday said he was “saddened” and “shocked” by the allegations.

Talking to The Indian Express on the war-of-words over his appointment as a one-man committee to look into the processes and procedures followed by the Department of Telecommunications in the allocation of licences and spectrum between 2001 and 2009, the former judge said: “I am deeply saddened and further shocked by the allegations which are wholly untrue and made belatedly after a lapse of more than three years, more so when there was no objection to my appointment earlier.”

“The allegations that I was appointed as a one-man committee relating to 2G spectrum to unearth NDA scam and that I lent my offices for a post-retirement assignment are both factually incorrect and contrary to the records,” Justice Patil said.

[related-post]

Jaitley made the allegation hours after a special court discharged former telecom secretary Shyamal Ghosh and three telecom firms in the 2002 additional spectrum allocation case, saying the chargesheet was full of distorted and fabricated facts.

“That the allegations are incorrect shall be clear to anyone by bare perusal and plain reading of the order of appointment, the terms of reference and my report dated January 31, 2011. The report is in the public domain. In addition, I have not accepted any post or assignment under the Congress or UPA after the report was submitted,” he added.

Elaborating, he said, “The period in the terms of reference covered both the NDA and UPA regimes. I went through all the records made available to me pertaining to the period 2001-2009 and submitted a report as per the terms of reference. What is contained in the report is consistent with the records. The report noted all irregularities between 2001 and 2009 where there were deviations in the procedures laid out. All the officials concerned in both NDA and UPA regimes were named.”

Incidentally, less than six months after he submitted his report, in which he indicted many Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led NDA government and Manmohan Singh-led UPA government functionaries, the judge was appointed Lokayukta of Karnataka on the recommendation of the then B S Yeddyurappa-led BJP government in the state.

Story continues below this ad

He, however, resigned from the post within two months after reports that his wife and he owned three plots in Bangalore in violation of city laws. He had described the reports as part of a “malicious campaign”.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • 2G 2G spectrum allocation spectrum allocation
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express InvestigationDisquiet in film board: ‘Censorship raj’, no meeting in 6 years, no reports, term lapsed
X