by
Advertisement
Premium

The Enfield Poltergeist review: New Apple series revisits the traumatic true story behind Conjuring 2 by wisely ignoring Ed and Lorraine Warren’s contributions

The Enfield Poltergeist review: Although it's far superior to Netflix's The Devil on Trial, Apple's four-part series about the true-story behind The Conjuring 2 isn't as engaging as it needed to be.

Rating: 3 out of 5
the enfield poltergeist reviewA still from The Enfield Poltergeist. (Photo: Apple TV+)
Listen to this article Your browser does not support the audio element.

A week after Netflix debuted the particularly Netflix-ian The Devil on Trial, a feature length YouTube video about the incidents that inspired the third Conjuring film, Apple has unveiled The Enfield Poltergeist, a characteristically more elaborate affair that delves into the true story behind The Conjuring 2. While it’s unfortunate that an entire generation’s only exposure to these relatively popular paranormal incidents is a couple of overrated horror movies, it seems like this isn’t going to change for at least some time.

The Devil on Trial was a joke, mainly because of its wilfully ignorant perspective, but The Enfield Poltergeist is never as engaging as it should be either, despite its seemingly more nuanced approach. Presented through the point-of-view of a self-styled paranormal investigator named Maurice Grosse, the four-part series deploys a rather unusual narrative approach. It has actors lip-sync to Grosse’s extensive audio recordings from back in the late ‘70s, interspersing these dramatic recreations with talking head interviews. The effect isn’t unlike watching a podcast.

Grosse made the astute decision to record everything on tape after having decided to essentially move into the 284 Green Street council house in suburban London, where two young girls appeared to be showing signs of possession. Janet and Margaret Hodgson were 11 and 13 at the time, living with their single-mother Peggy, and a younger brother who is curiously absent for the most part. They claimed to have witnessed objects both small and large being knocked over, and heard sounds ranging from loud bangs to carefully timed knocks. This was before a poltergeist named Bill took over young Janet’s body and mind.

Director Jerry Rothwell recreates these events inside a replica of the Hodgsons’ house, constructed on a soundstage. He often expands the frame to show the viewer the entire set — lights, scaffolding, rigs, the works — and not confine it to what you’d see in a regular film, especially one as bad as The Conjuring 2. A little distance, the show seems to be saying, always adds perspective.

The meticulous recreation also gives a sense of the oppressive mundanity that these people would likely have been experiencing at the time — not entirely because of the ‘paranormal’ activity, but also because that’s what things were like during Margaret Thatcher’s reign. Being holed up all day in a drab house, staring at a hopeless future, performing the same rinse-and-repeat rituals day in and day out; they don’t call an idle mind the devil’s playground for nothing.

Watching these events unfold on what is clearly a movie set heightens the sense of artifice that Wes Anderson captured so beautifully in his recent quartet of Netflix films. And this, primarily, is what Grosse was accused of by his detractors. Because he was so determined to prove that the haunting wasn’t a hoax, he refused to consider the dissenting opinion of others, including that of his colleagues at the (not made-up) Society of Psychical Research. Many of them are featured on the series as talking heads, as are Janet and Margaret, their relatives and neighbours, and an assortment of other people directly or tangentially connected to the events.

Thankfully, Ed and Lorraine Warren — the duplicitous protagonists of the Conjuring films — appear only briefly in episode three. And rather surprisingly, not a single member of the clergy shows up at any point, either to perform an exorcism, or simply educate Janet and her sister about the ways of the devil. Incidents like this only ever seem to happen to devout Catholics, or to people who strongly believe in the concepts of organised religion. From the earliest moments of the show, however, it is made clear that this wasn’t a case of demonic possession at all, but plain poltergeist activity.

Story continues below this ad

Mumbo-jumbo aside, the Enfield haunting was actually a case of a traumatised child being enabled by opportunists to continue her odd behaviour without getting proper help. The show reveals that Janet was particularly affected by the separation of her parents, which led her to create alternate realities in her mind as a trauma response. The most telling section of the show is when ‘Bill’ — that’s the spirit who appears to have taken control of Janet — shows an unusual interest in menstruation and contraception.

And none of the grown men who’ve devoted their lives to observing her night and day thought that this was a strange thing for a ghost to ask. Instead, they continually pestered ‘Bill’ for more evidence, only to validate their own beliefs, and not, crucially, to rid Janet of her pain. The show allows this argument, unlike The Devil on Trial, which practically contorted itself to avoid rationality before it became impossible to. But even when it invites opinions that challenge Grosse’s theories, the show never throws him under the bus; The Enfield Poltergeist is unexpectedly empathetic, not only towards the children involved, but also for the adults around them.

The Enfield Poltergeist
Director – Jerry Rothwell
Cast – Paula Benson, Daniel Lee, Charlotte Miller, Olivia Booth-Ford, Christopher Ettridge, Tom Bevan
Rating – 3/5

Rohan Naahar is an assistant editor at Indian Express online. He covers pop-culture across formats and mediums. He is a 'Rotten Tomatoes-approved' critic and a member of the Film Critics Guild of India. He previously worked with the Hindustan Times, where he wrote hundreds of film and television reviews, produced videos, and interviewed the biggest names in Indian and international cinema. At the Express, he writes a column titled Post Credits Scene, and has hosted a podcast called Movie Police. You can find him on X at @RohanNaahar, and write to him at rohan.naahar@indianexpress.com. He is also on LinkedIn and Instagram. ... Read More

Click here to follow Screen Digital on YouTube and stay updated with the latest from the world of cinema.

Tags:
  • Apple TV Plus horror movies The Conjuring the Conjuring 2
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Smoke & MirrorsThe grey reality of Delhi’s long-running experiment with green crackers
X