The writer taught political science at the University of Delhi
Pranab Mukherjee’s description of RSS founder does not stand up to scrutiny
RSS’s own documents highlight its opposition to a secular, democratic India.
Whenever Muslim localities and properties were attacked as revenge against some objectionable posts by some Muslims, or Muslims were targeted for allegedly carrying beef, public opinion generally decried such engineered violence.
Tarun Vijay told Al Jazeera whatever he learnt sitting at the feet of his GURU. Incidentally, if Tarun had made such a racist comment in USA or Europe, he would have been behind bars.
Indians are expected to ‘de-colonize’ their minds and believe that RSS vision of Hindu rashtra is not antithetical to a democratic-secular India.
Once a prime national centre of historical research, ICHR has been totally handed over to the RSS pracharaks.
It is only the old RSS vision for India recycled
The Indian Constituent Assembly approved the Constitution on November 26, 1949. Four days later, RSS rejected it through an editorial in its English organ Organiser on November 30, 1949
Ram Madhav’s assertions do not match the ideological discourse of the RSS.
It’s hard to reconcile the oath of ministerial office with what the RSS stands for
VS Naipaul who passed away on Saturday (August 11) occupied a rather curious place. Never the one to mince words, Naipaul had often been scathing not only against his peers but also against the place he belonged to.