P.D.T Achary

🔴 P D T Achary writes: It relies on broad interpretation of parliamentary procedure, and should bother democratically-minded citizens

P D T Achary writes: The Rules of the House do not empower Parliament to inflict any punishment on its members other than suspension for creating disorder in the House.

An open confrontation between members and the chairman is an unhealthy practice, which can only destroy the unity of purpose that is essential for the effective functioning of parliamentary committees.

The anti-defection law is contained in the 10th Schedule of the Constitution. It was enacted by Parliament in 1985. It came into effect on 1st March 1985.

The anti-defection law is routinely misinterpreted.

Concealing the identity of donors in electoral bonds goes against a fundamental tenet of democracy — transparency. Any executive Act which takes away transparency is anti-democratic and against public interest.

Supreme Court order makes it clear ‘services’ fall under Delhi government, not LG

That the government in Delhi is elected yet circumscribed points to a constitutional anomaly. Apex court should correct it.

Why the Centre’s notification against cattle slaughter is controversial

In the Lokpal delay, absence of a leader of opposition is a red herring

The right to withdraw money cannot be extinguished by demonetisation.

A Jain monk being called to address the Haryana Vidhan Sabha is a first. It raises issues of propriety and sanctity — and constitutional questions.

In spite of attempts to dress it as one, Aadhaar bill is not a money bill.

Considering the circumstances, the NDA’s ordinances are justified.

SC has asked for reasons for removing governors. Does NDA have any?