The famed Koh-i-Noor diamond cannot be brought back to Pakistan as it was handed over to the UK under the ‘Treaty of Lahore’ in 1849, the provincial Punjab government has informed the high court in Lahore.
“Maharaja Ranjeet Singh had inked the agreement with the East India Company in 1849 under which the precious diamond was given to the UK. Therefore, the UK government cannot be approached for return of the diamond,” a law officer of the provincial government told the court on Tuesday.
The Lahore High Court was hearing a plea seeking direction for the Pakistan government to bring back the Koh-i-Noor which India has also been trying to get from the UK for years.
- Trinamool MP’s outfit files petition in SC on Kohinoor
- The Kohinoor controversy: 1970 UN Convention offers some answers
- From Golconda to London, the journey of Kohinoor diamond
- Pakistan court accepts plea to bring back Koh-i-Noor from UK
- Return Koh-i-Noor to us, Pakistani barrister tells UK
- Queen Elizabeth may face legal challenge over Koh-i-noor diamond
Petitioner Barrister Javed Iqbal Jaffrey, however, opposed the government’s plea, arguing, “both governments were not authorised under the law of the land to sign such an agreement”.
Justice Khalid Mahmood Khan directed the government’s counsel to submit a copy of the agreement between the then ruler Ranjeet Singh and the East India Company on the next hearing on May 2.
In his plea, Jaffrey has alleged that Britain had snatched the diamond from Daleep Singh, grandson of Ranjeet Singh and taken it to the UK.
“The diamond became part of the crown of incumbent Queen Elizabeth II at the time of her crowing in 1953. Queen Elizabeth has no right on the Koh-i-Noor diamond, which weighs 105 carats and is worth billions of rupees,” he said.
He claimed that the Koh-i-Noor diamond was a “cultural heritage” of Punjab province and its citizens owned it in fact, it said and appealed to the court to direct the federal government to bring the diamond back to Pakistan from the British government.
The Indian government had recently said that it will make all efforts to bring back the valued diamond, even as it had earlier told the Supreme Court that the diamond was neither stolen nor “forcibly” taken by British rulers but given to the East India Company by erstwhile rulers of Punjab 167 years ago as compensation for helping them in the Sikh wars.