Why Trump administration proposed more tariffs on 60 nations and which countries are on the list
The United States Trade Representative said that the non-compliance is "unreasonable" and is actionable under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act, which allows the imposition of tariffs or trade restrictions.
The Trump administration on Tuesday proposed imposing additional duties of 10 per cent or 12.5 per cent on imports from 60 countries, including India, for failing to “impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor.”
Following an investigation, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) said that the non-compliance is “unreasonable” and is actionable under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act, which allows the imposition of tariffs or trade restrictions. The USTR has proposed duties on all products of the investigated economies, “except as provided in Annex A to the Federal Register notice.”
The federal agency suggested imposing 10 per cent tariffs on imports from six countries for their failure to effectively enforce “a prohibition on the importation of goods” produced using forced labour. These are:
Canada
Ecuador
European Union
Indonesia
Mexico
Pakistan
The other 54 countries could be slapped with 12.5 per cent duties over their failure to impose and effectively enforce prohibitions. The countries are as follows:
Algeria
Angola
Argentina
Australia
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Brazil
Cambodia
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
Egypt
El Salvador
Guatemala
Guyana
Honduras
Hong Kong
India
Iraq
Israel
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kuwait
Libya
Malaysia
Morocco
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Peru
Philippines
Qatar
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Africa
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Trinidad and Tobago
Türkiye
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Uruguay
Venezuela
Vietnam
Why did the Trump administration propose the tariffs?
After the US Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) in February, his administration said it would pursue alternative legal routes to impose duties.
Section 301 allows the USTR to investigate and take action against unfair trade practices. The federal agency must complete an investigation within 12 months.
In May, the Republican administration faced another setback after the US Court of International Trade scrapped the 10 per cent tariffs imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 that Trump introduced following the verdict on IEEPA duties.
Story continues below this ad
On Tuesday’s notification, the USTR labelled the alleged labour practices of the countries as “unreasonable.” Unlike the Section 122 duties, Section 301 offers the US government the ability to adjust tariffs, country-by-country.
In its reasoning, the Trade Representative argued that the countries’ failure to curb forced labour practices is “unreasonable” because it undermines the universal aim of eliminating forced labour and subjects US producers to unfair competition in export and the domestic markets.
The federal agency said that firms that indulge in forced labour produce goods at lower cost, thereby distorting market conditions and undermining the profitability of firms for other firms. The USTR also said that it “contributes to the circumvention of existing forced labor import prohibitions.”
The Express Global Desk at indianexpress.com which delivers authoritative, verified, and context-driven coverage of key international developments shaping global politics, policy, and migration trends. The desk focuses on stories with direct relevance for Indian and global audiences, combining breaking news with in-depth explainers and analysis.
A major focus area of the desk is US immigration and visa policy, including developments related to student visas, work permits, permanent residency pathways, executive actions, and court rulings. The Global Desk also closely tracks Canada’s immigration, visa, and study policies, covering changes to study permits, post-study work options, permanent residence programmes, and regulatory updates affecting migrants and international students.
All reporting from the Global Desk adheres to The Indian Express’ editorial standards, relying on official data, government notifications, court documents, and on-record sources. The desk prioritises clarity, accuracy, and accountability, ensuring readers can navigate complex global systems with confidence.
Core Team
The Express Global Desk is led by a team of experienced journalists and editors with deep expertise in international affairs and migration policy:
Aniruddha Dhar – Senior Assistant Editor with extensive experience in global affairs, international politics, and editorial leadership.
Nischai Vats – Deputy Copy Editor specialising in US politics, US visa and immigration policy, and policy-driven international coverage.
Mashkoora Khan – Sub-editor focusing on global developments, with a strong emphasis on Canada visa, immigration, and study-related policy coverage. ... Read More