Militia commander says it will attack Turkish forces if they enter Syria

Militia commander says it will attack Turkish forces if they enter Syria

The threat of armed resistance from the militia raises the risks for Turkey as it weighs sending troops into Syria, and for the US, which could find itself on the sidelines of a new front in Syria’s war — this time between two of its allies.

US militia commander says it will attack Turkish forces if they enter Syria
Syrian Democratic Forces fighters on Oct. 12, 2017 in Raqqa, Syria, a former ISIS stronghold. (The New York Times: Ivor Prickett)

Written by Ben Hubbard, Carlotta Gall and Eric Schmitt

The commander of the US-backed militia in Syria said Tuesday that it would attack Turkish forces if they enter northeastern Syria, while Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, indicated that such an operation was imminent.

“We will resist,” Mazlum Kobani, commander of the Kurdish-led militia, said in an interview with The New York Times. “We have been at war for seven years, so we can continue the war for seven more years.”

Erdogan, speaking to reporters on a flight to Serbia, said the operation might happen before the news could be printed. Turkish troops were being bused to the Syrian border in preparation for an incursion, Turkish media reported. And the Turkish Defense Ministry said on Twitter that preparations to enter Syria “had been completed.”


The escalating challenge came after President Donald Trump agreed to let the Turkish operation go forward and to move US troops out of the way. On Monday, US troops withdrew from posts near two Syrian towns near the border.

The threat of armed resistance from the militia, a force trained and armed by the United States, raises the risks for Turkey as it weighs sending troops into Syria, and for the US, which could find itself on the sidelines of a new front in Syria’s war — this time between two of its allies.

There was still confusion among allies and US officials about the administration’s policy as set out in seemingly contradictory statements by Trump and administration officials, and US officials said Tuesday that some senior Pentagon officials had been blindsided by the decision to pull American forces back from the border.

The Kurdish-led militia, the Syrian Democratic Forces, or SDF, partnered with the United States to defeat the Islamic State in Syria. Since then, the militia, with American backing, has retained control of a large swath of northeastern Syria.

Turkey considers the militia part of a Kurdish guerrilla movement that threatens Turkey, and Erdogan has demanded a 20-mile-deep buffer zone along the border that Turkey would control to keep back any Kurdish forces.

Explained: Turkey set to redraw map of Syrian war once more

Speaking by telephone from Syria, Kobani said he had been frustrated by the White House’s announcement on Sunday that the United States would stand aside for a Turkish incursion, and that the lack of clear, predictable policies from Washington had made it hard to plan.

“There should not be any ambiguity,” he said.

Caught between Trump, Turkey and Kurds, Pentagon struggles to piece together Syria strategy
President Donald Trump talks with Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (AP File Photo: Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

He spoke of US troops who had helped his forces fight the Islamic State as comrades-in-arms and said any rupture in that partnership could destabilize the region.

“We fought with US forces to get rid of terrorism, and we are still in this continuing battle,” he said.

He called on Americans to “put pressure on their political and military leaders to stop the Turkish attack,” which he said would lead to “big massacres.”

Trump said Sunday that the United States would not block a Turkish advance. But on Monday he said that he would “obliterate” Turkey’s economy if its military did anything “off limits,” without defining what that meant, and his aides insisted that he had not given a green light to an invasion.

On Tuesday, he said that he had invited Erdogan to visit the White House next month.

Also read | A look at who is affected by Trump’s shift in Syria

Two US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic and military conversations, said that given the apparently contradictory statements by Trump, the Turks seemed flummoxed about what support, if any, they might get from the United States. As a result, they may be rethinking what to do next, the officials said.

Turkish news media reported that Turkey’s armed forces were preparing F16 jets and howitzers. Special operations forces were arriving in buses at the border crossing of Akcakale just across from the Syrian town of Tel Abyad, and cranes were moving into position to lift concrete barriers at the border.

Tel Abyad was one of two towns evacuated by US forces on Monday. The other was Ras al Ain. US officials said Tuesday that Turkey had amassed several hundred troops, including tanks and other armor, near the two towns.

Political analysts with knowledge of the plan worked out with US officials said Turkey planned to set up four bases or combat posts in a narrow area along the border, and had agreed to stick to a limited action as a first stage.

“I would expect Turkey to implement a graduated incursion, then go back to negotiation with the US from a stronger position,” said Ozgur Unluhisarcikli, Ankara director of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. “Then when it is in a better situation, do a second operation, and a third, that is a graduated strategy.”

Trump’s argument that pulling US forces from Syria was a fulfillment of his vow to get Americans out of “endless wars” unleashed a wave of criticism, much of it from Republican lawmakers. Many argued that withdrawing the roughly 1,000 US troops in northeastern Syria would open a void that could be exploited by President Bashar Assad of Syria or his Russian and Iranian allies, or by the Islamic State.

Trump has not ordered a full withdrawal from Syria. The order on Sunday was only to relocate roughly 100 to 150 troops that had been stationed near the Turkish border. About two dozen were pulled back on Monday.

But analysts feared that any redeployment of Kurdish troops to fight Turkey in the north could take them away from the battle against the Islamic State. The Islamic State was driven from its last territory in Syria in February, but the SDF, with the support of US Special Operations forces, continue to battle the group’s remnants.

The US officials said the SDF was already beginning to move off some of its counterterrorism missions against the Islamic State.

“The danger of ISIS is real,” Kobani said, adding that it maintains sleeper cells throughout the territory. His forces also oversee prisons and camps holding tens of thousands of former Islamic State fighters and their families, which Trump has said Turkey could take over.

Kobani said there had been no conversations with the United States about handing over these prisoners to Turkey and he called the idea “impossible.”

Kobani said he would prefer that the United States remain in Syria until the Islamic State and its remnants are destroyed and the country reached a “complete political solution that guarantees everyone’s rights,” he said.

Read | When ‘Get Out’ is a President’s national security strategy

The Pentagon on Tuesday challenged published accounts asserting that Trump’s decision to order US troops to pull back from the border surprised many Defense and State department officials.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Gen. Mark Milley, the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, “were consulted over the last several days by the president regarding the situation and efforts to protect US forces in northern Syria in the face of military action by Turkey,” said Jonathan Hoffman, a Pentagon spokesman.


Several Pentagon officials confirmed that there had been discussions about Erdogan’s threats to invade northern Syria, but said that they had no hint that Trump was going to order US troops to step aside and leave their Syrian Kurdish allies vulnerable to attack.