scorecardresearch
Tuesday, Oct 04, 2022

US Attorney General issues broad ban against seizing media records

The Justice Department previously said it would stop the practice, but the details of the new policy had not been made public until Monday.

In this June 25, 2021 file photo, Attorney General Merrick Garland speaks during a news conference on voting rights at the Department of Justice in Washington. Garland has formally prohibited federal prosecutors from seizing the records of journalists in leak investigations. Garland's directive Monday reverses years of department policy. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland formalized a new policy on Monday that broadly prohibits prosecutors from subpoenaing reporters’ phone and email records, an abrupt shift after the Trump administration secretly seized records from several major news outlets in an effort to root out leaks.In addition to the new policy, Garland reiterated that the Justice Department would also throw its support behind new media shield legislation to make the policy permanent.

“A free and independent press is vital to the functioning of our democracy,” the memo says.

“The Department of Justice will no longer use compulsory legal process for the purpose of obtaining information from or records of members of the news media acting within the scope of news-gathering activities.”

The Justice Department last month held meetings with media executives to discuss formulating a new policy, after several media companies, including the New York Times, CNN and the Washington Post revealed that their reporters’ records had been seized during the Trump era in an effort to identify their confidential sources for national security stories.

Subscriber Only Stories
UPSC Key-October 4, 2022: Why you should read ‘Prachand’ or  ‘Green War R...Premium
After LCH, all eyes on development of indigenous medium lift Indian Multi...Premium
Govt saw fodder crisis coming over two years ago, but plans remained on p...Premium
ExplainSpeaking: As RSS sounds alarm, taking stock of India’s poverty, in...Premium

Last month, the Justice Department’s Inspector General Michael Horowitz announced his office had launched an inquiry into the seizure both of reporters’ records, as well as the records of top Democrats in U.S. House of Representatives including House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and committee member Eric Swalwell.

The Justice Department previously said it would stop the practice, but the details of the new policy had not been made public until Monday.

The memo largely protects journalists in the course of their job.

Advertisement

However, it does contain some limited exceptions.A journalist who is the target or subject of a criminal investigation, for instance, can still have his or her records seized in matters not connected to their “news-gathering activities,” as can someone who has used “criminal methods” to obtain the information.However, the policy makes it clear that prosecutors cannot subpoena a reporter’s records merely because the reporter possesses or publishes classified information.

The protections also do not extend in cases where a person or entity is an agent of a foreign government, a member of a terrorist organization or if a person’s life is in “imminent risk of death or serious bodily harm.”

First published on: 19-07-2021 at 10:29:30 pm
Next Story

Two women journalists move SC challenging sedition law

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement