Journalism of Courage

Pete Hegseth’s use of Signal to share airstrike details posed risk to US personnel: Pentagon watchdog

The report states that Hegseth should not have used Signal and that senior Defense Department officials need better training on protocols.

December 4, 2025 01:24 AM IST First published on: Dec 4, 2025 at 01:15 AM IST
Pete Hegseth’s use of Signal to share details of airstrike posed risk to US personnel, finds Pentagon watchdogUS Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth listens as President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House, Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

The Pentagon’s watchdog has found that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s use of the Signal messaging app to convey sensitive information about a military strike put US personnel and their mission at risk.

Singnalgate

One of the most embarrassing episodes of the early days of the second Donald Trump administration, often referred to as Singnalgate, happened in March when a group of US national security leaders used a group chat on Signal to discuss an imminent military operation against the Houthis in Yemen.

The discussions took place on a Signal chat group called Houthi PC small group, which was created by the then-National Security Advisor Michael Waltz.

Michael Waltz inadvertently added Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic magazine to the chat group. (Photo: Reuters)

What Hegseth discussed on Signal

Those participating in the discussion about the US military operations against Houthi rebels, code-named Operation Rough Rider, included US Vice President JD Vance, top White House staff, three Cabinet secretaries, and the directors of two Intelligence Community agencies.

Waltz had also inadvertently added Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic magazine to the chat group and the journalist had full access to classified details of the impending airstrikes shared by Secretary of Defense Hegseth. This included types of aircraft and missiles, as well as launch and attack times, before the men and women carrying out those attacks on behalf of the United States were airborne.

Story continues below this ad

Hegseth created another Signal group

Hegseth had created another Signal chat with 13 people that included his wife and brother, where he shared similar details of the same strike, The Associated Press reported.

Pete Hegseth shared classified information including types of aircraft and missiles, as well as launch and attack times. (Photo: Reuters)

The revelations sparked intense scrutiny, with Democratic lawmakers and some Republicans saying Hegseth posting the information to the chats before the military jets had reached their targets, potentially put those pilots’ lives at risk.

The inspector general opened its investigation at the request of the Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Roger Wicker and the committee’s top Democrat, Senator Jack Reed.

Some veterans and military families also raised concerns, citing the strict security protocols they must follow to protect sensitive information.

Story continues below this ad

Hegseth had played down the incident and told Fox News in April that what he shared over Signal was “informal, unclassified coordinations, for media coordinations and other things.”

What Pentagon watchdog found

According to CBS News, acting Inspector General Steven Stebbins’s report about “Signalgate” was sent to Hegseth on Tuesday. It was also sent to Congress and a redacted and unclassified version could be released as early as Thursday, a source told CBS News.

CNN reported that Hegseth has the ability to declassify material and the report did not find he did so improperly.

Citing an unnamed source, CNN said that the report states that Hegseth should not have used Signal and that senior Defense Department officials need better training on protocols.

Curated For You
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Tavleen Singh writesWhy ED’s conviction of 2 MLAs under PMLA is relevant now
X