The bench also allowed the Centre to include the 2.77 acres in the 67.7 acres of land to be acquired. (File)
A three-judge Supreme Court Bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer today ruled that a larger bench need not be referred to for the 1994 Ismail Faruqui judgment. In 1994, a five-judge Supreme Court bench had held that a mosque was not an “essential part of the practice of the religion of Islam” and that namaz could be offered anywhere and hence, “its acquisition (by the state) is not prohibited by the provisions in the Constitution of India”.
Click to follow the Ayodhya verdict LIVE updates
What is the 1994 Ismail Faruqui judgment?
Dr Ismail Faruqui had filed a petition challenging the validity of the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993, by which the Centre acquired 67.703 acres of land in and around the Babri Masjid.
Subscriber Only Stories
A five-judge Bench, in a majority, upheld the acquisition, saying “any step taken to arrest escalation of communal tension… can, by no stretch of argumentation, be termed non-secular… or against the concept of secularism — a creed of the Indian people embedded in the ethos.”
In their order, they declared that namaz could be offered anywhere. The judges said, “(Mosque) is not an essential part of the practice of the religion of Islam and namaz (prayer) by Muslims can be offered anywhere, even in open. Accordingly, its acquisition is not prohibited by the provisions in the Constitution of India”.
The bench also allowed the Centre to include the 2.77 acres (on which the Babri Masjid once stood) in the 67.7 acres of land to be acquired under the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya (ACAA) Act, 1993.
In the subsequent hearing in the Ayodhya land dispute case, in 2010 the Allahabad High Court had referred to this judgment to apportion one-third of the land to Hindus, one-third to Muslims and one-third to Lord Ram, the diety.
- The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd
First published on: 27-09-2018 at 01:34:43 pm
Subscribers Reading Now
Most Popular
Express Opinion
Since numbers always favoured a JD(U)-RJD tie-up, why did Nitish bide his time?
Premium
Darlings' director Jasmeet Reen
On Alia Bhatt's revenge, Shefali Shah-Roshan Mathew love story: 'Left it to people's imagination'
Salman Rushdie attack
Loud silence today echoes Parliament’s muted stand over years on Satanic Verses ban
Premium
Latest News
Shah Rukh-Gauri Khan support ‘Har Ghar Tiranga’ while fans are busy making Pathaan trend: ‘Pathaan will lift Bollywood up’
Tim Hortons, Canada’s iconic coffee brand, comes to India with two outlets in Delhi, Gurgaon
Hashtag Politics | BJP, Congress wrangle over Partition video, ‘missing’ Nehru
Rakesh Jhunjhunwala, the cheerleader for Indian markets and an invaluable friend
Independence Day 2022: 167-year-old steam engine to run on August 15
Their own worst enemy; how Britain’s education policy cost it the Empire’s Crown Jewel
Anil Kapoor remembers business tycoon Rakesh Jhunjhunwala: ‘Was a dear friend and well-wisher of Sonam, Rhea’
Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur, Premier League: When And Where To Watch
Karnataka: Former CM Siddaramaiah questions omission of Pandit Nehru from BJP government Independence Day message
Explained: How Rakesh Jhunjhunwala built a new investment narrative in India
SSC, Intelligence Bureau and PGT vacancies more: Top government jobs to apply this week
Here’s why you should replace paneer with tofu
