UPSC Key: India-Germany relations, Pax Silica, and Venezuela’s crude oil

— What are the major agreements signed between both the nations?

— What is the status of trade and investment between India and Germany?

— What are the challenges in India-Germany bilateral relationship?

— India-EU FTA key to unlocking India-Germany economic potential. Elaborate.

— What is the status of India-EU FTA?

— India and Germany agree that reforming global institutions is crucial for addressing global challenges. Why is it important?

Key Takeaways:

— These pacts include roadmaps on defence industrial cooperation and higher education, joint declaration on critical minerals and semiconductor ecosystem, a bilateral dialogue mechanism on Indo-Pacific. They also announced a visa-free entry regime for Indian passengers transiting through Germany.

— This means that Indian passport holders will be allowed to pass through German airports for onward flights without applying for a separate transit visa.

— “Chancellor Merz’s visit is taking place at a particularly significant time. Last year, we completed 25 years of our strategic partnership, and this year we are also celebrating 75 years of our diplomatic relations. These milestones are not merely markers of time. They are symbols of our shared ambitions, mutual trust and steadily strengthening cooperation,” Modi said after the meeting.

— Merz, who arrived in the early hours of Monday, visited the Sabarmati Ashram and engaged in kite-flying with Modi. While there was no announcement on any progress in the submarine deal, Modi said: “We will also work on a roadmap to enhance cooperation between our defence industries, which will open up new opportunities for co-development and co-production.”

— The joint statement said the leaders welcomed the signing of a joint declaration of intent to develop a defence industrial cooperation roadmap to promote “long-term industry-level collaboration, including technology partnerships, co-development and co-production of defence platforms and equipment. India welcomed Germany’s efforts to facilitate expeditious export clearances of defence equipment.”

— Modi said the comprehensive roadmap on higher education will give a “new direction to our partnership in the education sector”, and invited German universities to open campuses in India. 

— The joint statement said the leaders also welcomed the signing of the joint declaration of intent to “establish an Indo-German Centre of Excellence for Skilling in Renewable Energy”, which will strengthen cooperation in curriculum development for the Indian and German job market, cooperation with German and Indian industry and training in the renewable energy sector.

— The statement said the leaders welcomed the “sustained growth in bilateral trade and investment and noted that bilateral trade reached a record high in 2024, with the positive trend continuing through 2025. India-Germany bilateral trade in goods and services surpassed US$ 50 billion in 2024, amounting to over 25% of India’s trade with the EU.”

— With the meeting coming ahead of the EU leaders’ visit for the Republic Day celebrations, and the India-EU leaders’ summit on January 27, Modi and Merz “reiterated their support for the conclusion of the India–EU Free Trade Agreement as a key outcome of the upcoming EU-India Summit, which will facilitate trade flows and inject further momentum into German-Indian economic relations”.

— The two sides also signed a joint declaration of intent on strengthening bilateral economic cooperation through the German-Indian CEO Forum, which will further promote business and industry collaboration.

— Regarding the Indo-German digital dialogue, the leaders noted the finalisation of its work plan for 2026–27 and emphasised the importance of collaboration on internet & data governance, AI, semiconductors and Industry 4.0, and emerging technologies. They acknowledged the “signing of a JDoI on cooperation in the field of telecommunications,” it said.

— On Gaza, the joint statement said the leaders “reaffirmed their readiness to support efforts towards just and durable peace and reiterated their call for a just, lasting and comprehensive resolution of the conflict in the Middle East in the form of a negotiated two state solution.”

— About the UNSC reforms, Modi said, “India and Germany agree that reforming global institutions is crucial for addressing global challenges. Our joint efforts through the G4 group to reform the UNSC are a testament to this shared belief.”

Do You Know:

— Having come into existence as states at a similar time — India in 1947 Germany in 1949 after the devastation of World War II — the two countries entered into diplomatic relations almost immediately. In fact, India was one of the first nations to recognise the young Federal Republic of Germany in 1951.

— According to the Ministry of External Affairs, “Since May 2000, India and Germany have had a ‘Strategic Partnership’ which has been further strengthened with the launch of Intergovernmental Consultations (IGC) in 2011 at the level of Heads of Government.”

— “The IGC framework allows for a comprehensive review of cooperation and identification

of new areas of engagement at the Cabinet level. India is among a select group of countries with which Germany has such a dialogue mechanism.”

Other Important Articles Covering the same topic:

📍C Raja Mohan writes: In German chancellor’s India visit, a chance for deeper ties with Berlin

📍Mother Ganga, Father Rhine 

Previous year UPSC Prelims Question Covering similar theme:

(1) ‘Broad-based Trade and Investment Agreement (BTIA)’ is sometimes seen in the news in the context of negotiations held between India and (UPSC CSE 2017)  

(a) European Union

(b) Gulf Cooperation Council  

(c) Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development  

(d) Shanghai Cooperation Organization  

Setback for ISRO: PSLV mission fails again, deviates from path

Syllabus:

Preliminary Examination: Current events of national and international importance.

Mains Examination: General Studies-III: Science and Technology- Achievements of Indians in science & technology; indigenization of technology and developing new technology; Awareness in the fields of IT and space.

What’s the ongoing story: The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) suffered a major setback on Monday, with its PSLV-C62 mission, the first of the year, failing to reach its intended orbit because of problems in the rocket.

— What is the objective of the PSLV-C62 mission?

— What are the reasons for its failure?

— What are the major missions of the ISRO?

— What are the various launch vehicles of ISRO?

— What is the purpose of an earth observation satellite?

— What is the significance of the PSLV vehicle?

— What are the various stages of PSLV?

Key Takeaways:

— The PSLV-C62 rocket was carrying EOS-N1, an earth observation satellite, and 15 other payloads, including seven from Brazil and Nepal. All the payloads were lost.

— This was the second successive failure for a PSLV rocket, raising questions over the reliability of ISRO’s most successful launch vehicle. Its last flight in May 2025, which was carrying another earth observation satellite, EOS-09, had also met a similar fate. 

— In fact, in both these missions, the problem arose in the third stage of the flight, when the rocket was attempting to get into an orbit around the Earth.

— The reason for Monday’s failure was not immediately known. But the previous failure, in PSLV-C61 in May last year, was attributed to an unexpected drop in pressure in the combustion chamber of the third-stage engine.

— PSLV is ISRO’s mainstay rocket, having powered 65 of the 105 launches that India’s space agency has carried out till date. Only four of these, including the first one way back in 1993, have failed. 

— But two successive failures within a span of six months does blemish an otherwise fine record. It could be embarrassing for ISRO if the reasons for Monday’s failure turned out to be similar to what happened with the previous mission.

— It is the PSLV that is used for most of ISRO’s commercial launches, which bring in a lot of revenue as well as credibility. Five of the payloads on Monday’s mission were from Brazil, while one was from Nepal, the result of an India-Nepal collaboration. 

— Another payload was from the United Kingdom. ISRO has launched more than 430 satellites from 34 countries until now, and is seen as one of the most cost-effective and reliable agencies for commercial launches. This is why Monday’s failure is a cause of major concern for ISRO.

— It is the second time in a row that ISRO has had a bad start to a year. Last year’s first launch, involving the navigation satellite NVS-02, had also run into trouble. At that time the problem was not with the rocket. 

— The GSLV-F15 rocket had completed its job and placed the satellite in the geosynchronous transfer orbit. But the satellite’s own thrusters developed a problem after that because of which it could not be placed in the designated orbital slot.

— ISRO carried out only five launches last year, including the hugely important and keenly awaited NISAR mission, the first of its kind collaboration with NASA.

— This year, it was targeting at least six launches in the first quarter itself, including the first unmanned mission of the Gaganyaan human spaceflight programme. Monday’s setback can force a revision of this schedule.

EXPLAINED: For second straight time, ISRO sees third-stage issue

— The PSLV, or Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle, is what is known as a four-stage rocket. The stages refer to different parts of the rocket, each of which have their own engines and fuel. Each of these stages sequentially take charge of propelling the mission. They get detached and discarded after doing their job. The stages are sometimes also used to refer to the different phases of the mission flight.

— The first stage involves the lift-off. This is a near vertical journey till an altitude of about 50-60 km. This is the stage that requires the most work because the rocket has to fight gravity as well as atmospheric drag. For this reason, this stage needs a very heavy engine and lots of fuel.

— In the case of the PSLV, the first stage uses a solid propellant as fuel. The first stage forms a large part of the rocket, and constitutes the bulk of its weight. This stage lasts barely two minutes, during which a huge amount of fuel is consumed.

— After the fuel is spent, this part of the rocket becomes deadweight. So, it is jettisoned. It detaches from the main body of the rocket, and falls off, passing the baton to the second stage.

— During the second stage, the rocket continues to move vertically — and horizontally at the same time as it prepares to get into orbit. The second stage in the PSLV involves the famous, indigenously developed Vikas engine and a liquid fuel. This stage takes the vehicle to about 220-250 km from Earth’s surface before burning out.

— In the third stage, the vehicle is moving almost entirely horizontally, going around the Earth in an orbit, or rather a sub-orbital trajectory. To maintain this trajectory, and avoid falling towards the Earth, it needs to travel at very high velocities, usually 26,000 to 28,000 km per hour. The third stage is, therefore, about rapid acceleration. The PSLV rocket burns solid fuel to achieve this.

— A suitable low-earth orbit for the satellite can be at any altitude between 250-2,000 km from the Earth. The satellite has to be manoeuvred into that slot through guidance from the fourth-stage engine, which, in the case of PSLV, again uses liquid propulsion.

— The third stage is tricky. If a rocket is unable to attain the required velocity, it will be unable to maintain orbit around the Earth and get pulled down due to gravity. That is what seems to have happened with the PSLV-C61 mission last year.

— This is how this stage works. The solid fuel in the third stage is burned and converted into gas. This gas causes an increase in pressure in the combustion chamber. The gas is then released through a small nozzle to provide the thrust required to propel the rocket to higher speeds.

— In general, the higher the pressure, the greater is the thrust provided, and higher is the acceleration that can be attained. But if there is a leak, or the pressure drops in the combustion chamber owing to any other reason, the vehicle will not be able to attain the kind of acceleration and speed that is necessary to maintain the orbit.

— Space missions have a razor thin margin of error. Every other space agency has faced multiple failures. But back-to-back failures, and that too with a trusted rocket, is cause of concern for ISRO.

— In fact, three of the last six missions by ISRO have been unsuccessful, an unacceptably high failure rate for an agency such as this.

Do You Know:

— The PSLV is the third generation of Indian satellite launch vehicles. PSLV development started in 1982, and its maiden successful launch took place in October 1994. Most significantly, it marked India’s entry into the Big Rockets league, as it could carry a payload of up to 1,000 kg.

— It has also been called “the workhorse of ISRO” for consistently delivering various satellites into low Earth orbits (less than 2,000 km in altitude) with a high success rate.

— Some of India’s most ambitious space missions have been launched using this rocket — Chandrayaan-1 rode a PSLV rocket in 2008, as did Mangalyaan, the Mars Orbiter mission, in 2013.

Other Important Articles Covering the same topic:

📍Knowledge Nugget: ISRO’s Launch Vehicles — Must-know for your UPSC Exam

📍Five things to know about LVM3-M5

Previous year UPSC Prelims Question Covering similar theme:

(2) With reference to India’s satellite launch vehicles, consider the following statements: (UPSC CSE 2018)

1. PSLVs launch the satellites useful for Earth resources monitoring whereas GSLVs are designed mainly to launch communication satellites.

2. Satellites launched by PSLV appear to remain permanently fixed in the same position in the sky, as viewed from a particular location on Earth.

3. GSLV Mk III is a four-staged launch vehicle with the first and third stages using solid rocket motors; and the second and fourth stages using liquid rocket engines.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only

(b) 2 and 3 only

(c) 1 and 2 only

(d) 3 only

Month after kept out, India invited to join Pax Silica: membership expected to boost AI infrastructure

Syllabus:

Preliminary Examination: Current events of national and international importance.

Mains Examination: General Studies-II: Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests, Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests, Indian Economy.

What’s the ongoing story: Amid anticipation that India and the US are close to signing the first phase of the long-awaited trade deal, the newly appointed US Ambassador Sergio Gor on Monday said that the “next call” on trade between the two countries is set to happen on January 13. Gor also invited India to the Pax Silica initiative, a month after leaving New Delhi out of the US-led initiative, indicating a softening in tensions between the two countries.

— Read about the Pax Silica initiative and its member countries.

— What is the importance of Pax Silica for India?

— What is the use of silicon?

— What is the Minerals Security Partnership (MSP)?

— What is the status of India-USA relations?

— What are the areas of cooperation between India and USA?

— Read about the India-US trade deal.

Key Takeaways:

— Pax Silica is a US-led initiative focused on securing AI and tech supply chains, aimed at bringing “friendly and trusted” countries together to ensure that key technologies are safe, reliable, and not controlled by hostile play, according to the US State Department.

— The strategic initiative, seen as a counter to China’s grip on the global manufacturing supply chain, was launched on December 12 to “reduce coercive dependencies” and build a “secure, prosperous, and innovation-driven silicon supply chain” – from critical minerals and energy inputs to advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and logistics.

— However, Washington surprisingly left India out of the initiative that found mention of “allies” such as Japan, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Australia, giving way to concerns that uncertainty around the trade deal is creating broader differences between the two countries. Later in December, India extended a formal invitation to China to join its Artificial Intelligence (AI) Impact Summit in February.

— The West’s scepticism of China’s grip on the manufacturing supply chain had triggered global multinational companies to pursue a China-plus-one strategy since the COVID-19 disruption. The US has been engaged in a trade war with China to decouple due to the widening trade gap, and India has been positioning itself to get a share of the manufacturing supply chain shift.

— Experts said that the countries that are part of the US-led initiative are among the top in terms of AI and semiconductor supply chain, and should be a part of such an initiative, as measures under Pax Silica include “pursuing new joint ventures and strategic co-investment opportunities”. India currently lacks a global-scale AI infrastructure and stands to gain from the likely investments and partnerships under the initiative.

— The US State Department said that the initiative will also entail protecting sensitive technologies and critical infrastructure from undue access or control by countries of concern and building trusted technology ecosystems, including Information and Communication Technology (ICT) systems, fibre-optic cables, data centres, foundational models and applications. India has had concerns over China’s involvement in India’s critical infrastructure, such as telecom.

— India’s presence in Pax Silica could help New Delhi’s growth in technology-heavy sectors, which it currently lacks, deepening its import dependency. Experts said that the countries that are part of the US-led initiative are among the top in terms of AI and semiconductor supply chain.

Researchers have noted that the countries being roped in for the initiative are among the top countries in the domains of AI and semiconductor supply chains. The US, for instance, leads in design and IP for the semiconductor chips, and the Netherlands is essential for the lithography machines, which are used for printing chips.

— India’s entry in Pax Silica comes with considerable investments committed by US companies in Indian AI infrastructure in December alone. Last month, Microsoft announced plans to spend $17.5 billion to expand its AI infrastructure and cloud computing capacity in India over the next four years. The investment, its largest in Asia, comes on top of the $3 billion announced by the tech giant earlier this year, with Microsoft clarifying that it is on track to spend that amount by the end of 2026.

Do You Know:

— In June 2023, India was inducted into the MSP, a US-led collaboration of these 14 countries that aimed to catalyse public and private investment in critical mineral supply chains globally.

— A joint India-US statement issued on June 23, 2023, had then reiterated the intention of the two governments “to work together to ensure that our respective markets are well-supplied with the essential critical minerals” and reaffirming a pledge by the two sides “to hasten bilateral collaboration to secure resilient critical minerals supply chains”, welcomed India into the grouping.

— MSP partners include Australia, Canada, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Norway, the Republic of Korea, Sweden, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union (represented by the European Commission).

— The MSP grouping is focused on the supply chains of minerals such as Cobalt, Nickel, Lithium, and also the 17 ‘rare earth’ minerals. The alliance is seen as primarily focused on evolving an alternative to China, which has created processing infrastructure in rare earth minerals and has acquired mines in Africa for elements such as Cobalt.

— In January 2025, India launched a National Critical Mineral Mission to help achieve self-reliance in the critical mineral sector. In 2023, the Centre also identified 30 critical minerals, including lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite, tin and copper, which are essential for the country’s economic development and national security.

Other Important Articles Covering the same topic:

📍Knowledge nugget of the day: Minerals Security Partnership (MSP)

📍Gor outreach:Trump-PM friendship, hotline to White House, his connect

Previous year UPSC Prelims Question Covering similar theme:

(3) Recently, there has been a concern over the short supply of a group of elements called ‘rare earth metals’. Why? (UPSC CSE 2012)

1. China, which is the largest producer of these elements, has imposed some restrictions on their export.

2. Other than China, Australia, Canada, and Chile, these elements are not found in any country.

3. Rare earth metals are essential for the manufacture of various kinds of electronic items and there is a growing demand for these elements.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only

(b) 2 and 3 only

(c) 1 and 3 only

(d) 1, 2 and 3

Previous year UPSC Mains Questions Covering similar theme:

‘What introduces friction into the ties between India and the United States is that Washington is still unable to find for India a position in its global strategy, which would satisfy India’s National self-esteem and ambitions’. Explain with suitable examples. (UPSC CSE 2019)

 

NATION

First time in 50 years, coal-fired electricity generation saw year-on-year decline in 2025

Syllabus:

Preliminary Examination: Current events of national importance, General issues on Environmental ecology.

Mains Examination: General Studies-III: Conservation, environmental pollution and Energy. 

What’s the ongoing story: For the first time in half a century, coal-fired electricity generation in India saw a year-on-year decline in 2025, driven largely by the rapid growth in power generation from renewables, a new study by Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) has said.

— India’s stand on coal phase-out-Know in detail.

— What is India’s main source of electricity?

— What are the factors behind the decline in coal-fired electricity generation  in India?

— What are the concerns associated with coal-fired electricity generation?

— What is the share of India’s power sector in total greenhouse gas emission in India?

— How is renewable energy growth altering India’s electricity generation mix?

— What is the role of renewable energy in meeting peak electricity demand in India?

— What are the challenges and opportunities related to renewable energy integration into India’s power grid?

— Read about the key government schemes to achieve renewable energy targets.

Key Takeaways:

— Coal-fired plants generated a total of 1,283 billion units of electricity in 2025, 3% less than 1,322 billion units generated in the previous year even as overall electricity generation was about 1% higher than in 2024.

— The overall trend of coal-fired electricity generation, though, has not changed in the last few years. Even when the generation from coal was increasing year-on-year in absolute numbers, the rate of growth had been showing a decline. In 2024, coal-fired generation increased by 5% as against 15% in 2023, the study showed.

— The actual generation from coal had shown a decline in 2022 as well but that could be attributed to a lull in industrial activity due to Covid pandemic.

— Apart from the increase in renewable energy generation, relatively milder summer and a decrease in power demand growth due to other reasons also contributed to the dip in coal-fired electricity generation in 2025, the study said.

— Generation from renewable sources increased by 22% (270 billion units instead of 221 in 2024) while that from large hydro grew by 15% (180 billion units instead of 157), the study showed.

— It said that considering the rapid expansion in clean energy installed capacity (41 GW of new renewable capacity was added in the first 11 months of 2025), India might have to revise its plans for coal capacity additions for the 2030 period.

— India is the third largest emitter of greenhouse gases in the world, with the power sector contributing about 40%.
— The decline in coal-fired electricity generation has happened in China as well. A research carried out by CREA for Carbon Brief showed that coal-based electricity generation in China in 2025 was 1.6% lower than the previous year. This is the first annual dip in coal-based electricity generation in 50 years in China as well, the study said.

— China is the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter. In October last year, China said it would begin to rein in its emissions and set a target of 7-10% reductions from an unspecified peak level by 2035.

Other Important Articles Covering the same topic:

📍Knowledge Nugget: India’s ‘green’ power capacity overtakes thermal — What you must know for UPSC Exam

📍Renewables edge out coal as world’s biggest source of electricity: Many positives, some concerns

 

THE EDITORIAL PAGE

Equality isn’t enemy of growth. High inequality erodes social trust 

Syllabus:

Preliminary Examination: Current events of national and international importance.

Mains Examination: General Studies-II: Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Health, Education, Human Resources; and Issues relating to poverty and hunger.

What’s the ongoing story: Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes: If one were to read public debates in India on economic equality, one might be forgiven for associating equality with four sins. First, what matters, apparently, is poverty reduction, not inequality — inequality is dismissed as a distraction. 

— What are the reasons for inequality in India?

— How does inequality affect society?

— What are the reasons for poverty in India?

— How do the investment in Health, education, sanitation, and social protection help to move away from poverty?

— What are the major schemes launched by the government for social protection?

— What is oligarchy?

Key Takeaways:

— Second, equality is portrayed as the enemy of entrepreneurship. Third, it is assumed to entail greater bureaucratic control by the state. Finally, talk of equality is cast as resentful, socialist levelling down. 

— But what is striking about these associations is the absence of even a rudimentary understanding of why, quite apart from any intrinsic appeal, there are compelling pragmatic reasons to take equality seriously, precisely to achieve the very objectives that inequality is said to advance.

— First, the claim that poverty reduction and equality are rivals is a laughable piece of mystification. High inequality can directly undermine poverty reduction by weakening the growth elasticity of poverty. 

— We also know that distribution affects investment: Extreme concentration of wealth can depress consumption and thereby weaken investment demand. Equality is not inherently hostile to growth — it is often a precondition for growth that is broad-based and capable of delivering wage gains for the majority. 

— Second, the relationship between equality and entrepreneurship is far more complex than is usually acknowledged. Under some conditions, inequality might spur growth, but this relationship is contingent and fragile. 

— In India, much attention is understandably devoted to the role of state regulation in impeding entrepreneurship. But the concentration of wealth can be just as damaging to the diffusion of entrepreneurial activity.

— When access to credit, education, networks, and legal protection is tightly correlated with inherited wealth, entrepreneurship is drawn from a narrow social base. More equal societies expand the pool of potential entrepreneurs by lowering entry barriers and reducing the catastrophic costs of failure.

— High inequality also produces severe misallocation of talent. Capable individuals are drawn into rent-rich sectors, finance, lobbying, speculation, and regulatory arbitrage, rather than productive innovation.

— Third, equality does not logically entail bureaucratic micromanagement. Indeed, high inequality often requires more discretionary state power, not less: Subsidies to capital, regulatory forbearance for large firms, selective tax enforcement, and ad-hoc bailouts.

— Finally, the charge of resentful levelling down misunderstands the direction of causality. Egalitarian policies are not about pulling the top down, but about preventing inequality from corroding the social and economic conditions necessary for sustained prosperity.

— High inequality erodes social trust. India is arguably less threatened by egalitarian resentment than by a high concentration of capital that nervously seeks to control the rest of society, fearful of challenge from those who may be more capable or innovative.

— In this sense, the way income inequality is framed in public debate is a red herring. By associating all talk of equality with resentment, we avoid asking serious questions about inequality’s real effects. 

— The political force of resentment against wealth is often exaggerated. What people worry about instead are the pragmatic consequences of inequality for growth, entrepreneurship, social trust, and institutional integrity. 

— For a social contract to tolerate wealth inequality, it must ensure that such inequality does not hollow out democratic citizenship. In India, the oligarchic shaping of political agendas and the distortion of public values may be at least as serious a threat as populist overreach.

— The precise policy responses are, of course, complex. The relationship between growth, entrepreneurship, and inequality is contingent. But it is a measure of how degraded our public discourse has become that these elementary truths, that equality need not impede growth or entrepreneurship, have to be restated at all.

Do You Know:

— The reasons for the existence of poverty are analysed differently by different schools of thought. One influential school of thought sees poverty to be a result of the actions taken by the poor people themselves. The “blaming poor people for their poverty” approach looks at poor people as “lazy”, “imprudent”, or “unwilling to take risks”. 

— Martin Ravallion, one of the important economists who have worked on poverty, noted that “blaming poor people for poverty has long provided a justification for public inaction against poverty.” Such negative attitudes reflected in the social and institutional mistreatment of the poor not only deepen systemic injustice but also undermine their chances of getting out of poverty. 

— The World Bank updated the global poverty line in September 2022 to $2.15 per person per day, replacing the 2017 poverty line of $1.90, based on purchasing power parity (PPP). 

— According to recent estimates, 8.5 per cent of the world’s population lives in extreme poverty – which is around 682 million people. Notably, China and India are among the countries experiencing the greatest national reduction in people living below the poverty line.

Other Important Articles Covering the same topic:

📍Who is poor in today’s India? What an updated Rangarajan poverty line looks like

📍The 2025 book on oligarchy that may explain 2026

Previous year UPSC Prelims Question Covering similar theme:

(4) The Multi-dimensional Poverty Index developed by Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative with UNDP support covers which of the following? (UPSC CSE 2012)

1. Deprivation of education, health, assets and services at household level

2. Purchasing power parity at national level

3. Extent of budget deficit and GDP growth rate at national level

Select the correct answer using the codes given below:  

(a) 1 only

(b) 2 and 3 only  

(c) 1 and 3 only  

(d) 1, 2 and 3  

Previous year UPSC Mains Question Covering similar theme:

Inequality in the ownership pattern of resources is one of the major causes of poverty. Discuss in the context of ‘paradox of poverty’. (UPSC CSE 2025)

 

EXPLAINED

The ‘heavy’ lure of Venezuela’s crude for the US

Syllabus:

Preliminary Examination: Current events of National & International importance.

Mains Examination: General Studies-II: Effect of policies and politics of developed and developing countries on India’s interests.

What’s the ongoing story: The United States is the largest oil producer in the world and a top exporter of the so-called black gold. Yet, the Donald Trump administration clearly seems to want Venezuelan crude. In addition to the pursuit of continued energy market dominance and keeping oil prices in check, the very nature of Venezuelan oil—highly viscous, sticky and “sour”—appears to be a key reason behind American interest in it.

— What is the difference between heavy crude oil and light crude oil?

— What are the implications of the US capturing of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro?

— What is the strategic significance of Venezuela’s oil reserves?

— What is the status of India’s ties with Venezuela and the US?

— What is the significance of Venezuelan heavy crude in US energy and foreign policy calculations?

— How have US sanctions on Venezuela impacted India–Venezuela trade relations?

— Map work: Locate Venezuela. (Refer atlas)

Key Takeaways:

— The bulk of Venezuelan crude is classified as a heavy sour crude—heavy because it is thicker and denser than the lighter crude oil grades, and sour because of its high sulphur content. By contrast, the majority of US oil production—particularly the shale formations—is light and sweet (low viscosity and sulphur content).

— However, much of the American refining infrastructure—particularly the US Gulf Coast refineries—were specifically engineered to process heavy crudes from Latin America and Canada. Therefore, the US still has to import heavy sour crudes to feed these refineries, even as it exports massive volumes of its own light sweet oil. 

— Crude oil is not exactly a fungible commodity in practice because of the differences in quality of various types or grades of oil. And which type of crude is likely to be easily available in adequate volumes is a key factor in refinery configurations.

— Against this backdrop, securing heavy sour crude oil supplies from Venezuela—which has the world’s largest oil reserves—at low prices is of interest to the Trump administration.

— The mismatch between the US domestic oil production and its refineries’ primary crude diet of heavy crude grades is explained by the period when many of these units were built, which was in the last century. The shale oil revolution, on the other hand, came about only in the first decade of the 21st century.

— When these refineries were set up, heavy sour crudes were the most easily available to the US—from the country’s own domestic conventional oil fields, and later from nearby countries like Venezuela, Mexico, and Canada. For a better part of the last century, major American oil companies invested billions of dollars in Venezuela’s oil industry, helping feed the US refineries with heavy sour crude.

— Heavy sour crudes are usually notably cheaper than light sweet crudes, which means that the feedstock cost for the expensive-to-set-up complex refineries is much lower than that of a relatively less complex refinery that cannot handle heavy crude grades. But the financial and efficiency arithmetic goes awry if costly complex refineries have to consume expensive light and sweet crude.

—- That is why the US continues to import significant volumes of the cheaper heavy crudes, while exporting its domestic light crude oil at a premium in the international market. While it makes economic sense to import cheaper oil and export its own expensive oil, it also means that the US is on the constant lookout for stable supplies of heavy crude from other countries for its own refineries. But some of the countries, like Venezuela, Iran, and Russia, which have significant heavy crude reserves, continue to have an adversarial relationship with Washington.

— Venezuela was a major source of crude oil for the US till the early 2000s, and American oil majors heavily dominated the sector there. Then the Latin American country’s oil production and exports started dwindling in a period marked by an increase in state control of Venezuela’s oil industry under Hugo Chavez. Nationalisation of assets saw US oil majors like ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips exit Venezuela in 2007, and the country’s national oil company increasingly grappled with corruption and mismanagement.

— The period also saw deterioration in Venezuela’s oil infrastructure, which was plagued by extreme underinvestment. The relationship between Washington and an increasingly socialist Caracas also deteriorated further over the years.

— With US sanctions on Venezuela greatly constraining the flow of Venezuelan crude in the international oil market, China became its leading destination. Over the past couple of decades, China also poured billions of dollars into Venezuela, including in the oil sector, filling the vacuum left by American oil majors. Russia, too, has been investing heavily in the Venezuelan petroleum industry.

— With Maduro’s ouster and Trump looking to dictate his terms to Caracas, the future of Venezuelan oil supplies to China is now unclear, and experts believe that much of this oil could flow to the American refineries going forward, helping them reduce intake of relatively costlier heavy oil from other countries. Also, the outlook for the significant Chinese and Russian investments in Venezuela is now uncertain. In that context, Trump’s declaration of taking over Venezuela’s oil sector can also be seen as an attempt by Washington to cut Chinese and Russian influence in the Americas.

Other Important Articles Covering the same topic:

📍Renewed Venezuelan oil flow may help India in medium to long term

📍Knowledge Nugget: Beyond Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro’s Capture — What you must know for the UPSC Exam

UPSC Prelims Practice Question Covering similar theme:

(5) Consider the following statements with respect to Venezuela’s crude oil:

1. It is home to the largest proven crude reserve on Earth.

2. It accounts for more than 15% of global production.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

(a) 1 only

(b) 2 only

(c) Both 1 and 2

(d) Neither 1 Nor 2

ALSO IN NEWS
EV retrofit push: How converting old cars to electric works & why it may be expensive	As the national capital continues to battle foul air, the Delhi government had announced plans last week to incentivise the retrofitting of old petrol and diesel cars and their conversion into electric vehicles (EVs) under its new EV policy. EV retrofitting refers to the process of converting existing petrol or diesel vehicles into electric vehicles. During retrofitting, the fuel tank, engine, fuel pipes, exhaust system, and engine accessories are replaced with a battery, controller, and motor.
UN top court opens landmark case on Rohingya genocide	Myanmar will face accusations on Monday that it is responsible for genocide against the Rohingya ethnic minority at the top court of the United Nations, as long-awaited hearings are set to begin. The West African country of Gambia first filed the case at the International Court of Justice in 2019, arguing a so-called “clearance operation” by Myanmar’s military in 2017 violated the 1948 Genocide Convention.
Two Nipah virus cases detected in Bengal, govt starts contact-tracing	he West Bengal government on Monday said that two cases of Nipah virus have been detected in the state. Both the affected individuals are medical staffers of a private hospital in Barasat in North 24 Parganas district and are admitted there, the government said. Nipah is a viral infection that mainly affects animals such as bats, pigs, dogs, and horses, but can jump to humans who come in contact with infected animals and cause serious illness. It can be transmitted through food items such as fruit or date palm sap that has been contaminated with bodily fluids of an infected animal, usually bats.
The genesis of the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, now part of US policy under Trump	The recent invocation of the Monroe doctrine by President Donald Trump following his capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has brought doctrine in light. Former President of USA James Monroe’s annual message to the United States Congress outlined two core principles that together became known as the Monroe Doctrine. The first, the non-colonisation clause, sought to prevent European powers from pursuing future colonial expansion in the Americas. The second was the principle of non-interference, which warned European powers against imposing their political systems on the Americas or threatening the integrity of newly independent states.

 

PRELIMS ANSWER KEY

1. (a)  2. (a)  3. (c)   4. (a)  5. (a)

Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.

🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for December 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨