This is an archive article published on April 7, 2025
Premium

Art and Culture with Devdutt Pattanaik | Sultan, Badshah and Shahenshah, what these titles say about India’s Muslim rulers

Who were the three great Muslim “gunpowder” kingdoms that dominated the world after 1600 AD? How did Mughals - who called themselves Badshah (world-emperor) and Shahenshah (king of kings) - differ from the earlier Turkish Sultans?

Muslim rulers in IndiaA 16th century miniature painting depicts Babur at a banquet. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Written by: Devdutt
7 min readNew DelhiApr 8, 2025 07:52 PM IST First published on: Apr 7, 2025 at 06:49 PM IST

(The Indian Express has launched a new series of articles for UPSC aspirants written by seasoned writers and scholars on issues and concepts spanning History, Polity, International Relations, Art, Culture and Heritage, Environment, Geography, Science and Technology, and so on. Read and reflect with subject experts and boost your chance of cracking the much-coveted UPSC CSE. In the following article, Devdutt Pattanaik, a renowned writer who specialises in mythology and culture, explains why Muslim rule in India cannot be seen as a homogenous entity.)

Politicians usually refer to the Islamic period (1000 to 1800) as the Mughal period (1500-1800), but that is not quite correct. Mughals had Mongolian roots, while earlier Muslim rulers of India had Turkish (Ghurids, Mamluks, Khilji, Tughlaq) and Afghan (Lodi, Suri) roots. Mughals followed imperial Persian court rituals. The Turks and Afghans were more tribal, so preferred the egalitarian Arab ways.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments