scorecardresearch
Monday, Jan 30, 2023
Advertisement

Google defends Android OEM deals for Google Search, Chrome apps

Google and the EU clashed over the company's Mobile Application Distribution Agreements (MADAs) that requires (OEMs) to pre-install the Google Search app and Chrome browser app in return for licensing Google Play for free.

Google, YouTube, Google advertisements, Google funding, Google on funding media, Google on climate change, YouTube news, Google newsGoogle, the largest digital-ad seller, has been criticized for letting companies looking to debunk or deny climate change buy search ads (Image Source: Reuters)

Alphabet unit Google on Tuesday said deals with Android phone makers that landed it a record 4.3-billion-euro ($5 billion) antitrust fine boosted competition and rejected EU charges they were a carrot-and-stick tactic that stifled rivals.

Google was addressing the second day of a week-long hearing as it tries to get Europe’s second-highest court to annul the fine and a European Commission order to make it loosen its search engine grip on Android devices.

Lawyers for Google and the EU competition executive clashed over the company’s Mobile Application Distribution Agreements (MADAs) that require phone makers (OEMs) to pre-install the Google Search app and Chrome browser app in return for licensing Google Play for free.

Subscriber Only Stories
ExplainSpeaking: How to evaluate a Union Budget
Mahesh Vyas writes: Why the job shortage is for real
Delhi confidential: Focus On Projects
Gandhi to Tagore: At old St Stephen’s campus, a glimpse into remnants of ...

“This licensing model is what attracted OEMs to the Android platform, and what enabled those OEMs to offer a consistent and high-quality user experience at the lowest possible price,” Google’s lawyer Alfonso Lamadrid told the General Court.

“People use Google because they choose to, not because they’re forced to,” he said.

Commission lawyer Carlos Urraca Caviedes rejected the argument, calling the deals and other restrictions Google’s carrot-and-stick policy towards phone makers.

Advertisement

“These helped Google ensured its competitors would not achieve critical mass to challenge its dominance,” he told the court.

He also said such deals were unnecessary in view of the market power of Google, the world’s most popular internet search engine, and its significant number of users.

Advertisement

Urraca Caviedes said what Google did “goes beyond what is necessary to develop and maintain the Android platform”.

A verdict may come next year. The case is T-604/18 Google vs European Commission.

($1 = 0.8537 euros)

Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; editing by Barbara Lewis

First published on: 28-09-2021 at 19:32 IST
Next Story

Burberry shows ‘animal instinct’ with deconstructed trench for spring

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close