scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Wednesday, April 21, 2021

‘Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly as pair faced better bowlers than Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli’

Ian Chappell believes that on the basis of the quality of the opposition, Sachin Tendulkar and Sourav Ganguly were better as back in their time each team atleast had two quality seamers.

By: Sports Desk |
Updated: December 22, 2019 6:55:46 pm
Rohit Sharma with Virat Kohli. (Source: File Photo)

For more than five years now, the pair of Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma has stacked up astonishing numbers between them across all the formats of cricket for India, but according to Ian Chappell, when it comes to facing quality bowlers, the celebrated opening pair of Sachin Tendulkar and Sourav Ganguly had a far tougher job.

“An argument could be mounted that Kohli and Sharma are India’s best-ever one-day batsmen. The obvious challengers would be the feted combination of Sachin Tendulkar and Sourav Ganguly, who tormented international bowlers for 15 years,” Chappell wrote in his column for ESPNcricinfo.

The former Australia captain furthered his argument in the favour of Tendulkar and Ganguly that back in their time each international team had two quality seamers.

“They (Tendulkar-Ganguly) spent bulk of that time opening together against some of the best fast-bowling combinations. Facing Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis from Pakistan; Curtly Ambrose and Courtney Walsh of West Indies; Glenn McGrath and Brett Lee of Australia; Allan Donald and Shaun Pollock for South Africa; Lasith Malinga and Chaminda Vaas of Sri Lanka was a serious test of a batsman’s skill.”

Quoting a comment of Pakistani pace great Imran Khan that “you judge a man by his opponents”, the 76-year-old said, “On the basis of the quality of the opposition, you’d have to lean towards Tendulkar and Ganguly.”

“However, if you extrapolate their current figures to give Kohli the same number of innings as Tendulkar, and Sharma the equal of Ganguly, the current pair finish well in front,” he added.

However, later in his column, Chappell acknowledged that Kohli and Sharma are the best-ever white-ball combination, as they both are well adept to T20I cricket too.

“Their combined ODI and T20I records are excellent, with Kohli — averaging over 50 in both formats — at the unbelievable level. To be fair, Tendulkar played very little T20I cricket and Ganguly’s career was finished by the time the format blossomed,” he wrote.

He said even though Tendulkar led the way in being the first batsman to score an ODI double-century, Rohit has fine-tuned the art by scoring three doubles, with his 173-ball 264 against Sri Lanka in 2014 still standing as the record to beat.

“Indian fans have been extremely fortunate to witness, close up, four of the best short-form batsmen of all time,” Chappell wrote.

“With Tendulkar, it was his all-round mastery of the art but he never ceased to amaze with his back-foot forcing shots on bouncy pitches for a man short in stature. When he was going there was no better off-side player than Ganguly; his drives, so effortlessly played, would pierce even the most crowded cover field.”

About Kohli and Rohit, he said, “It’s not so much the huge scores that stamp Kohli’s class but the regularity of his success. He punishes bowlers all round the wicket by keeping the ball on the ground the bulk of the time. Thanks to him eliminating a lot of the risk in batting, his scores are consistently high but still amassed at a good rate.”

“Sharma, on the other hand, tends to play risk-free cricket early on, but once he gets motoring, it’s a case of ‘watch out in the stands’. While he does not exude muscle power like Chris Gayle, Sharma hits nearly as many sixes per innings and has a higher strike rate.”

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Sports News, download Indian Express App.

  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
x