scorecardresearch
Tuesday, Dec 06, 2022
Premium

MS Dhoni’s stand on Gurunath Meiyappan contradicted by Mudgal report

Dhoni had maintained that Meiyappan, BCCI President-in-exile N Srinivasan's son-in-law, was not an official of CSK.

MS Dhoni had maintained that Gurunath Meiyappan, BCCI President-in-exile N Srinivasan's son-in-law, was not an official of CSK (Source: PTI/File) MS Dhoni had maintained that Gurunath Meiyappan, BCCI President-in-exile N Srinivasan’s son-in-law, was not an official of CSK (Source: PTI/File)

Indian skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni’s stand that Gurunath Meiyappan was a “mere cricket enthusiast” supporting Chennai Super Kings has been contradicted by the Justice Mudgal IPL probe committee report.

The report, which was partly made public on Monday, has said that investigations have confirmed that Meiyappan was a team official of a franchisee (Chennai Super Kings).

Dhoni, who had appeared before the committee, had maintained that Meiyappan, BCCI President-in-exile N Srinivasan’s son-in-law, was not an official of CSK.

In its first report submitted to the Supreme Court, the Mudgal committee had stated “representatives of India Cements, who appeared before the committee, contended that Mr Meiyappan had no share holding in India Cements and hence cannot be considered as an owner of CSK.

Subscriber Only Stories
How a private firm came to be at the centre of Bengaluru data theft casePremium
Amid show of unity, signs of discord dot Rahul yatra route in RajasthanPremium
India’s G20 Presidency: Championing the Global SouthPremium
Delhi Confidential: When PM Modi asked Andhra CM Jagan about the detentio...Premium

“Further, Mr M S Dhoni, Mr N Srinivasan, and officials of India Cements took the stand that Mr Meiyappan, had nothing to do with the cricketing affairs of Chennai Super Kings and was a mere cricket enthusiast supporting CSK,” the report stated.

When contacted, Justice (Retd) Mudgal, who headed the committee, declined comment, saying that the matter was sub-judice.

“I cannot speak on these matters since it is sub-judice,” he said.

Advertisement

In the final report, which was released, the committee said that Meiyappan was “frequently meeting Individual 2 in his hotel room. This strengthens the conclusion of the committee that Individual 1 (Meiyappan) was in close touch with Individual 2.”

“Thus the committee is of the view that due to the scientific evidence of voice-matching and testimony of the security personnel, recorded by the investigating team, the finding about the betting activities of Individual 1 and that he was a team official stand confirmed,” the committee said in its findings.

First published on: 18-11-2014 at 04:28:39 pm
Next Story

Bigg Boss 8: Gautam turns dictator, will the housemates accept?

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close