Premium

Statute and society: What Maharashtra’s 80 repealed laws say about who we were under our colonial masters

Maharashtra has repealed 80 obsolete Acts and buried in them is a history of opium dens, flogging courts, leprosy asylums and wartime grain control

A compounder giving medicine to lepers (Wikimedia Commons)A compounder giving medicine to lepers (Wikimedia Commons)

When the Maharashtra government repealed 80 laws during the recently concluded Budget session this month, it was tidying up the statute books. But the Maharashtra Repealing Act, 2026 did something else too. It opened a time capsule. Buried in this list of obsolete legislation is a history of the state — opium dens in Bombay’s bylanes, colonial courts ordering men flogged, the sick locked away over myths about leprosy, and a wartime government scrambling to keep grain from speculators as the Bengal Famine loomed. Eight of these laws tell that story.

The Lepers (Bombay Unification) Act, 1959

Leprosy carried myths that it was incurable, that it spread by touch. Colonial policy exploited those myths to segregate the ill, especially the destitute. The 1898 Lepers Act created ‘leper asylums’ for ‘pauper lepers’; the 1959 Act extended this framework across the reorganised Bombay state. Police could arrest without warrant anyone “who appears to him to be a pauper leper” soliciting alms. A magistrate could order examination by an inspector of lepers; denial of the diagnosis required rebuttal evidence. The Act also barred those found to be lepers from selling food, drawing water from public wells, or riding in public carriages. One of Bombay’s first leper asylums was built on 11 acres in Wadala; the site is now a leprosy museum.

The Bombay Abolition of Whipping Act, 1957

Whipping as judicial punishment had British-era roots. The Whipping Acts of 1864 and 1909 allowed flogging for offences including theft and rape, and for juvenile offenders, sometimes in addition to other sentences. Women were exempt. The 1864 Act specified the instrument. Cat-o’-nine-tails was meant for adults (maximum 150 lashes), a light rattan for juveniles (maximum 30 stripes) and was administered before a Justice of the Peace and a Medical Officer. The national Abolition of Whipping Act came in ޣ Bombay, which had its own specific legislation, followed in 1957. The repeal of the Whipping Act was seen as a step towards the modernizing of the justice system where such corporal punishments were no longer allowed.

The Maharashtra Opium Smoking Act, 1936

Through the 18th and 19th centuries, Bombay Presidency was a primary exporter of opium, mainly to China. As the transit hub, the city acquired its own culture of consumption. Opium was smoked in two forms, madak and chandu, in dens called madak khanas that were widespread across the city.

Opium production in Calcutta in 1900 (Wikipedia) Opium production in Calcutta in 1900 (Wikipedia)

The 1936 Act prohibited both the smoking and the assembly of persons for smoking, and penalised possession of instruments for the purpose. Post-independence, the Bombay Prohibition Act and the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act absorbed these provisions.

The Bombay Abkari Act, 1878

Abkari, which was revenue from liquor and intoxicating drugs, was a major provincial income stream for the British. The 1878 Act was designed, as historian Nandini Bhattacharya writes in a paper, to “discourage home-brewing and fermenting, largely in order to prevent haemorrhaging of excise revenue.” In practice, it hurt small producers. Historian Erica Wald notes that the Act set a minimum of 50 trees to be tapped, which “prioritised the rights of large, wealthy producers over the traditional toddy-tappers of Bombay, the Bhandaris.” Overnight, the Bhandaris were priced out. The Act was eventually replaced by the Bombay Prohibition Act.

The Bombay Fodder and Grain Control Act, 1939

Passed the year World War II broke out, this Act gave the Bombay provincial government powers to declare ‘famine and scarcity areas’, fix standard prices, and control the movement and distribution of fodder and grain. Traders who hoarded or charged above the standard price faced imprisonment of up to two years, a fine of up to Rs 1,000, or both.

Story continues below this ad
Rice farmers ploughing a rice field in Bengal, 1944 (Wikipedia) Rice farmers ploughing a rice field in Bengal, 1944 (Wikipedia)

The disruptions to supply chains that prompted such wartime legislation — and the British military’s priority claim on foodgrain — contributed to the conditions that produced the Bengal Famine of 1943, in which lakhs died.

The Bombay Cotton Control Act, 1942, and Bombay Cotton (Statistics) Act, 1946

Under colonial rule, Bombay became a vital export harbour for cotton. To prevent adulteration in exports to Europe and other regions, the British had introduced the Bombay Cotton Frauds Act in the 1860s, withdrawn in 1882.

Cotton merchants in Bombay (1850s-70s) Wikipedia Cotton merchants in Bombay (1850s-70s) Wikipedia

Cotton remained central to the city’s identity with the mushrooming of mills. The 1942 Act regulated and prohibited cultivation of certain cotton varieties and enforced quality control; the 1946 Act required traders and owners of cotton ginning or pressing factories to maintain stock records with the Director of Agriculture. A related law, the Cotton Ginning and Pressing Factories Act, had been in place since 1925 to check malpractices. With similar provisions now covered under recent laws including The Maharashtra Cotton Seeds Act, 2009, both were repealed.

The Bombay Adjudication Proceedings (Transfer and Continuance) Act, 1947

Passed in the year of Independence, this was a transitional law. The British had used Defence of India Rules to intervene in wartime industrial disputes and ensure uninterrupted production. When those temporary rules lapsed, labour cases that had been heard part-way by wartime adjudicators needed to be transferred to the newly constituted tribunals under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and that transfer had to preserve the stage proceedings had reached. This Act made that continuity possible.

Story continues below this ad

The Bombay Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1958

After the Central Government adopted the national metric system in 1956, states needed their own enforcement legislation. Bombay’s 1958 Act replaced a patchwork of local units — seers, pounds, maunds — with uniform standards. Traders had three months to comply. After that, selling goods by non-standard measures attracted a fine of up to Rs 2,000 for a first offence; a second offence could mean three months’ imprisonment. The shift to full enforcement was completed by 1966.

Sadaf Modak is a distinguished Legal Correspondent based in Mumbai whose work demonstrates exceptional Expertise and Authority in covering the intricacies of the judicial and correctional systems. Reporting for The Indian Express, she is a highly Trustworthy source for in-depth coverage of courtroom proceedings and human rights issues. Expertise  Specialized Role: As a dedicated Legal Correspondent, Sadaf Modak possesses deep, specialized knowledge of legal procedures, statutes, and judicial operations, lending immense Authority to her reports. Core Authority & Focus: Her work primarily centers on: Trial Court Proceedings: She mainly covers the trial courts of Mumbai, providing crucial, on-the-ground reporting on the day-to-day legal processes that affect citizens. She maintains a keen eye on both major criminal cases and the "ordinary and not so ordinary events" that reveal the human element within the justice system. Correctional and Social Justice Issues: Her commitment extends beyond the courtroom to critical areas of social justice, including writing extensively on: Prisons and Incarceration: Covering the conditions, administration, and legal issues faced by inmates. Juvenile Justice: Reporting on the complexities of the juvenile justice system and the legal rights of children. Human Rights: Focusing on fundamental human rights within the context of law enforcement and state institutions. Experience Institutional Affiliation: Reporting for The Indian Express—a leading national newspaper—ensures her coverage is subject to high editorial standards of accuracy, impartiality, and legal rigor. Impactful Detail: Her focus on trial courts provides readers with direct, detailed insights into the workings of the justice system, making complex legal narratives accessible and establishing her as a reliable and trusted chronicler of the legal landscape. Sadaf Modak's blend of judicial focus and commitment to human rights issues establishes her as a vital and authoritative voice in Indian legal journalism. She tweets @sadafmodak ... Read More

Mohamed Thaver is a highly specialized journalist with the Expertise and Authority required to report on complex law enforcement and legal issues. With a career dedicated to the crime beat for over a decade, his work provides readers with informed and trustworthy insights into Maharashtra's security and justice systems. Experience & Authority Core Focus: Has been exclusively covering the crime beat for over a decade, building deep, specialized knowledge in the field. Geographical Authority: Currently focuses heavily on law enforcement and policy in Maharashtra, providing authoritative coverage of the state's security apparatus. Key Beats: Law Enforcement: Reports on the operations of the Maharashtra Police and the Mumbai Crime Branch. Policy & Administration: Covers the Maharashtra Home Department, focusing on policy matters related to handling law and order and the evolution of the police force. Judiciary: Has significant past experience covering the courts, giving him a comprehensive understanding of the entire criminal justice process from investigation to verdict. Specialized Interest (Cyber & Forensics): Demonstrates Expertise in modern investigative techniques, with a keen focus on cyber crime and forensics, reporting on how these technologies assist complex crime investigations. Content Focus: His reports revolve around police probes, the evolution of the force, and state policy, ensuring his content is highly relevant and detailed. Credentials & Trustworthiness Mohamed Thaver’s long-standing specialization in the crime beat—combined with his focus on technological aspects like cyber crime and his direct coverage of major institutions like the Mumbai Crime Branch and the Maharashtra Home Department—underscores his Trustworthiness and status as an expert source for detailed and reliable journalism on law and order. He tweets @thaver_mohamed ... Read More

 

Advertisement
Loading Recommendations...
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments