This is an archive article published on August 15, 2017
Premium

Voices of Partition: A Dhaka Hindu and a Kolkata Muslim recount what Independence meant to them

If the incoming Hindu population faced the bitterness of displacement on one hand, then the Muslims who stayed on in West Bengal were equally distraught.

11 min readNew DelhiAug 11, 2022 10:38 PM IST First published on: Aug 15, 2017 at 01:50 PM IST
Independence day, Independence day 2017, 15th August 2017, 71st independence day, 70 years of independence, India at 70, 70 years of partition, partition, partition history, Indian independence day, independence day India, Independence day news, Indian Express Hossainur Rahaman (left) and Basanti Roychowdhury (right) (Express Photo)

The Radcliffe Line cut through the heart of the subcontinent and was clearly the biggest cost of Independence. As the line cut through lives across India and the newly-created Pakistan, there emerged bone chilling accounts of deaths, violence and suffering from the North West and Eastern quarters of India.

However, there was a significant difference between the way Partition took place in Punjab and in Bengal. While the former represented a sudden cataclysmic division of territories, the latter was a long drawn slow process lasting even several years after independence.

Advertisement

Accordingly, the partition of Punjab was way bloodier than what its counterpart in the East witnessed. Though less dramatic, the partition of Bengal, however, was no less disturbing. Less about blood, the division of Bengal was more about displacement and the crisis of migration and property loss, that went on for the next several years.

Adrija Roychowdhury leads the research section at Indianexpress.com. She writes long features on his... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments