The men around Vijay: Why Tamil Nadu CM’s inner circle is under scrutiny
A network of people from the film world, business associates, and journalists propels the CM’s advisory structure. But critics allege a lack of transparency.
The DMK has complained about Vijay's associates Vishnu Reddy and John Arokiasamy (first two from left) attending government meetings. The appointment of K Venkata Narayana, the producer of Vijay’s film Jana Nayagan, as Tamil Nadu’s Special Representative in New Delhi also raised eyebrows. Every government has a coterie that runs the system. Around Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay that group consists of a mix of political consultants, film managers, film production controllers, campaign operators, journalists, business associates and old loyalists; a cast of characters who appear to fluidly move between party, government, and the personal sphere.
Vijay is entitled to trust people from the world of cinema, media, and his private professional circle — and these people can bring competence into governance — but the question before the TVK government is: if they exercise authority, why is the public learning about them through Instagram posts and the Opposition’s complaints?
In a complaint to the DGP on June 30, the DMK’s organisation secretary, R S Bharathi, sought the registration of an FIR over the alleged participation of John Arokiasamy and Vishnu Reddy in Cabinet meetings, official reviews, and other confidential meetings of the CM. Bharathi alleged possible offences under the Official Secrets Act and other laws, arguing that Vijay was bound by his oath of secrecy to protect confidential government proceedings. While Reddy is Vijay’s close aide, Arokiasamy is a political strategist, and both helped the CM as he made his way to the top of the political order in the state.
DMK MP P Wilson also questioned the presence of the two men in high-level government meetings. If they are not government servants, he asked, in what capacity did they attend meetings where secret documents were circulated? He also alleged that the two had been given chambers near the CM’s office.
Top TVK sources said the charge itself was misplaced. According to them, there are necessary government orders that authorise both Arokiasamy and Reddy to be part of critical meetings. “Just that the details may not be celebrated in the public domain, but they are not private persons anymore,” said a leader.
That answer may satisfy the legal minimum inside the government. Politically, it raises the next question. If those orders exist, some with Cabinet ranks, why not release them? Transparency could have ended the controversy in an afternoon. Instead, the government has allowed a cloud to form around two men whom its leaders say are officially empowered.
Other appointments
The pattern is not limited to just the two. Vijay’s long-time manager Jagadish Palaniswamy — who also manages several prominent Tamil actors — revealed his own government posting in an Instagram birthday message to Vijay on June 22. “Happy Birthday to my God…” he wrote. The same post also disclosed that he was now the “Private Secretary to the Honourable Chief Minister”. A senior TVK leader said Jagadish’s appointment had been decided at least four days earlier and that he used his proximity to the CM to reveal it himself, unlike Reddy or Arokiasamy.
