Premium

Tamil Nadu, Kerala went to Supreme Court over Governors sitting on Bills: How many are still pending?

While senior DMK leader T K S Elangovan calls the court’s opinion a “good judgment” that will be useful in other cases involving a Governor’s powers, Kerala Law Minister P Rajeev says the Constitution Bench’s opinion “positive” on issues the state government had raised

President Droupadi MurmuPresident Droupadi Murmu. (File)
5 min readChennai, ThiruvanathapuramNov 21, 2025 10:05 AM IST First published on: Nov 21, 2025 at 08:10 AM IST

After a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday said no timeline could be fixed for the President and Governors to act on Bills passed by state legislatures, although “inaction that is prolonged, unexplained and indefinite” by the Governor “will certainly invite limited judicial scrutiny”, a senior DMK leader in Tamil Nadu and Kerala Law Minister P Rajeev welcomed the top court’s opinion to a Presidential Reference. Both states had moved the top court against their governors for sitting on Bills.

The Bench was answering the reference President Droupadi Murmu had made in the wake of a two-judge bench of the court fixing timelines for the President and Governors in its April 8 judgment, while deciding the matter of the Tamil Nadu government challenging the state Governor’s act of withholding assent to 10 Bills. The two-judge bench had ruled that a Bill can be reserved for the President only in the first instance.

Arun Janardhanan is an experienced and authoritative Tamil Nadu correspondent for Read More

Shaju Philip is a Senior Assistant Editor at The Indian Express Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments