Tougher exam leak Bill clears Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi raises police crackdown

Hailing passage, Govt flags learning from experience; LoP demands Shah resignation over July 20 action.

Union Minister Kiren Rijiju slammed Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi's remarks in the Parliament on WednesdayUnion Minister Kiren Rijiju on Wednesday held a meeting with Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi. (Sansad TV)
6 min readNew DelhiJul 30, 2026 05:32 AM IST First published on: Jul 29, 2026 at 09:10 PM IST

Wrapping up a two-day debate punctuated by acrimonious exchanges as the Opposition slammed the government over the police crackdown on student protesters in Delhi, Lok Sabha Wednesday passed the stringent Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 by a voice vote amid sloganeering.

Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi’s remarks against Union Home Minister Amit Shah over the July 20 police action led to stormy scenes with strong protests from the treasury benches – one of the words he used was expunged from House records.

Advertisement

Later, the government hailed the passage of the Bill. Union Minister Jitendra Singh, who replied to the debate, said it reflected the government’s “openness to incorporate constructive inputs, learn from experience and further strengthen the law” to deal with exam paper leaks.

Shah, in a post on X, congratulated “every student in India” on the passage of the Bill, saying it “shields the dreams and aspirations of our youth by laying down iron-clad provisions imposing the harshest punishment on those who dare to breach the sanctity of public examinations”. The Modi government, he said, “will spare no one who attempts to imperil the future of our students and will leave no stone unturned to ensure that they face the full wrath of the law”.

Speaking to the press after the day’s proceedings, Gandhi demanded Shah’s resignation and a Supreme Court-monitored probe into the “brutalities” against the students. He said he was not allowed to speak in Lok Sabha, that every time he tried to speak in the House, he was “silenced”.

Advertisement

BJP national spokesperson Sambit Patra accused Gandhi of trying to “mislead the country with his lies”, of creating a ruckus in the House and using unparliamentary words. “He alleged he was not given a chance to speak… When 45 people were given a chance to speak, why would Rahul Gandhi not be given a chance to speak?” he said.

“Rahul Gandhi has divided the country’s students into three categories, and this is an insult to the students. We clearly state that all students of this country are desh bhakts (patriots); no student of this country is an idiot or an andhbhakt (blind follower),” Patra said.

Earlier, while participating in the debate, Gandhi accused Shah of “ordering police action” against students during the July 20 protests in Delhi.

Objecting to the remarks, Union Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju demanded that Gandhi substantiate his allegations and apologise to the House.

“You are the Leader of the Opposition. Speak with seriousness. On what basis did you make this statement? How can he say that someone ordered firing? It is a breach of his own position and privilege,” Rijiju said.

Speaker Om Birla also intervened, urging Gandhi to make statements based on facts and maintain the dignity of the House. He also said that some of Gandhi’s remarks will be expunged from House records.

When the treasury benches demanded that Gandhi apologise, Opposition members rallied behind him, saying “Rahul ji ko bolne do (let Rahul speak)”, leading to noisy scenes.

Gandhi said the protesting students had shown courage. “The students of the country are saying we will not become andhbhakts (blind followers). This is a beautiful expression. Their parents perhaps did not have the courage to face the BJP and the RSS. Yet these children, brave, imaginative and powerful, stood there and faced whatever you threw at them,” he said.

Targeting Dharmendra Pradhan who resigned as Education Minister last week, Gandhi said, “Rajnath Singhji said we are not the UPA and our ministers never resign. He is right. The resignation of Pradhan is superficial because he never ran the education system. The Education Ministry is run by the RSS. The man who runs it is the OSD sitting in the minister’s office.”

Speaking to reporters outside the House, Gandhi said there can be just “two options” – one that the Home Minister “gave the orders” (for action against students), and second that the “Home Minister didn’t know that firing will happen”. He also asked why Shah had not been coming to the House.

Jitendra Singh, while replying to the debate on the Bill, also spoke of the “unparliamentary language” used by Gandhi. “I am surprised that the LoP doesn’t know the basic parliamentary norms,” he said.

Singh said the LoP did not seem to know that any order to fire a gun is given by a magistrate. “It has been clarified that shots were never fired, tear gas was used. When the gun was not fired, the question of who gave the order does not arise,” he said.

He said the amendments would further strengthen the legal framework to prevent unfair means in public examinations and safeguard the interests of students and youth. The government, he said, remained committed to ensuring the integrity, transparency and credibility of the public examination system.

Highlighting the key provisions of the Bill, Singh said the punishment for persons resorting to unfair means has been enhanced from imprisonment of three to five years to five to ten years, while the maximum fine has been increased from Rs 10 lakh to Rs 50 lakh.

For service providers involved in such offences, the maximum fine has been enhanced from Rs 1 crore to Rs 5 crore and the period of debarment from conducting public examinations has been increased from four years to eight years. The Bill further enhances punishment for organised crime from five to ten years’ imprisonment to seven to ten years and increases the maximum fine from Rs 1 crore to Rs 10 crore.

Singh said the Bill provides for the establishment of special fast-track courts for offences relating to public examinations and envisages completion of investigation within two months and completion of trial within three months from the date of filing of the charge sheet.

Referring to the implementation of the 2024 Act, he said that 52 FIRs have already been registered under its provisions.

Asad Rehman is with the national bureau of The Indian Express and covers politics and policy focusin... Read More

Anonna Dutt is a Principal Correspondent who writes primarily on health at the Indian Express. She r... Read More

Jatin Anand is an Assistant Editor with the national political bureau of The Indian Express. With ov... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments