Congress tears into criminal law overhaul: ‘Animated by negative desire of leaving a Modi stamp’

Such blanket, wholescale amendments, he said, were only “animated by this negative desire”. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill, 2023, among other things, seeks to reinvent the provisions related to sedition in the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

“I must admire the Dutch courage of this government and its utter insensitivity. Thick-skinness also has its limits. The Supreme Court has repeatedly opined against sedition and here is a government acting to strengthen it.”

The new piece of legislation does not use the word sedition, but describes the offence as “endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India”.

Section 150 reads: “Whoever, purposely or knowingly, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or by electronic communication or by use of financial mean, or otherwise, excites or attempts to excite, secession or armed rebellion or subversive activities, or encourages feelings of separatist activities or endangers sovereignty or unity and integrity of India; or indulges in or commits any such act shall be punished with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.”

On changes in provisions related to rioting, Singhvi said, “The provisions proposed regarding rioting are clearly and deliberately intended to have a communal twist with a slanted mindset. We have seen such negative actions even without this law coming; now this law and its apparent legitimacy will make it worse.”

Former Law Minister Ashwani Kumar, on the other hand, hoped the three new Bills tabled would achieve their desired objective of strengthening the nation’s criminal justice system. “It is self-evident that changes in laws from time to time are part of a continuing process of legal evolution to make legal structures responsive to changes in the social and political consciousness of the nation. The changes were prompted by judgments of the Supreme Court and the Government’s appreciation of their need,” he said.

While changes in laws on “sedition, mob lynching, and crimes against minors and women are welcome”, he said the “absence of a comprehensive law against custodial torture to address its several dimensions is not understandable”.

“Hopefully, such a law will be introduced soon in furtherance of the right to dignity guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution,” Ashwani Kumar said.

He said a major challenge for the government was to ensure that the new laws were purposefully and conscientiously implemented and not misused to oppress innocent persons and are enforced consistently with respect for legal due process. “The test of a civilised power is in the fairness of its use, just as the ultimate test of laws is in their just application,” said Kumar.

BJP afraid of INDIA: DMK

Hitting out at the Centre, the DMK said it showed how much the BJP “is afraid of ‘India’”, alluding to the name of the 26-party Opposition bloc.

Senior DMK leader and party spokesperson T K S Elangovan said the word “Bharatiya” was being used in the three Bills instead of India as “they are afraid of the term”. Elangovan told PTI, “They have changed the name of the Bills to ‘Bharatiya’ instead of ‘India’. So how much they are afraid of India, they stand exposed. They are afraid of the term ‘India’ because the name was taken by opposition parties. This is all very immature … exhibits the immaturity of this government.”

— With PTI inputs

⚖️Want to understand the Centre’s recent overhaul of criminal laws better? We’ve got you covered. Check out some of our special reportage:

👉🏼 From holding trials on video to community service as punishment: Centre’s overhaul of criminal laws
👉🏼 Key provisions and processes proposed in Bill to replace CrPC
👉🏼 Expert Explains: What does the proposed legislation to overhaul criminal justice system mean?
👉🏼 From holding trials on video to community service as punishment: Centre’s overhaul of criminal laws