Tuesday, Sep 27, 2022

The incomplete father

Why is fatherhood not considered integral to a man like motherhood to a woman?

happiness, life positive Fatherhood and parenting barely make it to the list of desirable traits that society makes compulsory for a man, unlike for a woman. Source: getty images

Motherhood makes a woman complete is an oft-repeated platitude. But never does one get to hear that fatherhood makes a man complete.

Father’s day just passed us by. Yet, the fact remains that fatherhood is simply not considered integral to the intrinsic worth of a man in the same way motherhood is considered integral to a woman.

The idea of a woman being incomplete in herself, made complete only by the appendage of a relationship that defines her, is so entrenched in the social psyche that a woman who would even mention that she does not consider motherhood as central to her existence would be considered “unwomanly”. In essence, to be womanly enough, you must be defined by your maternal instinct.

If a woman willingly chose to stay away from motherhood — despite being married — people would be quick to condemn her as someone far removed from the values of Indian culture. The same parameters do not apply to men, however.

Subscriber Only Stories
Kurmi club: On national path, Nitish looks east, at UP’s Sonelal Pa...Premium
Interview: MD-CEO, Central bank of India | ‘During PCA years, none of our...Premium
The Kurmis: a political historyPremium
Deepti Sharma and the question of law vs spirit in cricketPremium

Fatherhood and parenting barely make it to the list of desirable traits that society makes compulsory for a man, unlike for a woman. Men are hardly ever defined by the kind of fathers they make, the kind of upbringing they give to their children.

For a man to be hesitant about fatherhood is considered “normal” because it is assumed that for men, freedom, exploration and achievement are of utmost importance. For women, it is supposed to be home and hearth.

There is an exception to this “compulsory motherhood” clause for women, though. The exception is the woman who chooses celibacy as a way of life, devoting herself to the service of religion. In that case, she is considered a pious woman who made a great sacrifice. However, a woman who is an active sexual being, who chooses to take a partner and enter into the sexual partnership of marriage, is supposed to necessarily want to be a mother on all counts.


A woman is not supposed to be sexual, unless she is also maternal. She is not supposed to experience desire as means of pleasure and sensual gratification, but only as a means to a maternal end — wanting sex for the sole purpose of becoming a mother. If she does not wish to choose motherhood, then she must decide to remain celibate.

It is also common for high-achieving mothers to be asked how they manage family responsibilities. The same question is not put to high-achieving fathers, simply because fatherhood is not considered the primary role in a man’s life. Parenting is not supposed to feature as a major time-consuming responsibility for a man. In fact, such fathers abound in our society who live abroad, without their wife and children, and visit them perhaps once in a year. No one considers it relevant to ask them any questions about fatherly responsibilities.

A father becomes a father simply by giving his name to the child, but a mother is not considered a mother unless she has sacrificed everything that she possibly can. It becomes important, then, to remind men that parenting is as much of a serious responsibility for them as for women.


A fascinating example of a father-child relationship that comes to mind is that of Jawaharlal Nehru and his daughter Indira Priyadarshini. Nehru’s letters to his daughter Indira, written over the course of several years spent in prison, are heart-warming examples of a father’s love and guidance.

On Indira’s birthday, Nehru referred to his letters as gifts sent to her. “What present can I send you from Naini prison?” he wrote. “My presents cannot be very material or solid. They can be of the mind and spirit. Things that even the high walls of prison cannot stop.”

In these “presents”, Nehru imparted to his daughter lessons on a wide range of topics, including languages, trade, history, geography, science, epics and evolution, in a way a 10-year-old could comprehend them.

What is most remarkable about them is that Nehru did not wish to sermonise or lecture — as so many Indian parents end up doing. He wrote: “I have always thought that the best way to find out what is right and what is not right, what should be done and what should not be done, is not by giving a sermon, but by talking and discussing, and out of a discussion sometimes a little bit of truth comes out. I have liked my talks with you and we have discussed many things…”

But he expressed his concern at how the letter, by its very nature, becomes a one-way communication instead of a discussion. “But what am I to do then?” he asked. “A letter can hardly take the place of a talk; at best it is a one-sided affair. Imagine that I have made a suggestion to you for you to think over, as if we really were having a talk.” That is the hallmark of an effective parent — who encourages the child to question and reflect, rather than blindly follow orders.


Imprisonment prevented Nehru from being physically present to guide and parent his daughter. He, therefore, wrote these letters as a way to be a “present” father even from the prison. A “present” father is what every man should aspire to be.

As Pope John XXIII said, “It is easier for a father to have children, than for children to have a real father.”


Naqvi is an independent journalist and author of the forthcoming book, The Reluctant Mother

First published on: 02-07-2020 at 07:54:56 pm
Next Story

Kerala expands testing, records day of most Covid-19 recoveries

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments