When Ajit Doval meets Sartaj Azizhttps://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/editorials/when-doval-meets-aziz/

When Ajit Doval meets Sartaj Aziz

Gurdaspur and Udhampur underline fragility of India-Pak peace — and its sheer necessity.

Udhampur terror attack, Gurdaspur terror attack, Ajit Doval, Sartaj Aziz, Narendra Modi, Nawaz Sharif, India Pakistan peace talk, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Muhammad Naveed, Pakistan terrorism, indian express editorial, ie editorial
Sartaj Aziz and Ajit Doval

India’s national security advisor, Ajit Doval, is scheduled to meet his Pakistani counterpart, Sartaj Aziz — the first step forward for the narrowly focused security dialogue Prime Ministers Narendra Modi and Nawaz Sharif agreed to last month. The meeting couldn’t be taking place at a more appropriate time. In the last fortnight, the fragility of India-Pakistan peace has been underlined twice, first by the fidayeen strike on the Dinanagar police station in Gurdaspur, and then by the capture of alleged Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist Muhammad Naveed in Udhampur. It doesn’t take much imagination to see that either event could have escalated into a full-blown crisis. Had bombs placed on the railway tracks in Gurdaspur detonated, scores of passengers may have been killed.

Many Indian soldiers may have died had Naveed’s attack proved successful. Events like these, in the future, could well compel the Modi government to respond in a muscular fashion, potentially sparking events that are in the interests of neither New Delhi nor Islamabad. Modi and Sharif agreed to resume dialogue not because either is a dovish romantic, but to prevent precisely such a crisis. Now, the process will be put to test.

There’s little doubt that Doval, an intelligence veteran with decades of experience in dealing with Pakistan-backed terrorism, will meet Aziz armed with considerable scepticism about what his interlocutor is willing, and capable, of delivering. It is imperative, though, that he be equipped with hard evidence on terrorism emanating from Pakistan, and a clear list of actionable demands. Islamabad should also be told that such action is in its own interest. The best prospects for preventing the two countries from lurching into another crisis of the kind that broke out in December 2001 — which inflicted great costs on India, but even larger ones on Pakistan — is for Islamabad to be seen to be walking its talk on terror.

Large parts of Pakistan’s military establishment see no dividend in cracking down on terrorist groups operating against India. Indeed, it may seem to be tactically useful to recruit them to the coalition against those jihadists determined to overthrow the state. The meeting is a good opportunity for Delhi to make clear that this may not prove a cost-free enterprise, crisis-averse as Modi’s economy-focused government may be. History isn’t stacked in favour of the process: the Joint Anti-Terrorism Mechanism set up by PMs Manmohan Singh and Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani in 2009 yielded precisely nothing, while covert contacts between Indian and Pakistani intelligence chiefs had few tangible results. The awful costs of failure, though, are good enough reason to try again.