This is an archive article published on November 2, 2019

The sovereign test

WhatsApp breach violates rights of Indian citizens. Government must ensure those responsible are held to account.

3 min readNov 2, 2019 08:19 AM IST First published on: Nov 2, 2019 at 12:06 AM IST
Maharashtra economy, Maharashtra government formation, Maharashtra news, Indian Express editorial India is a constitutional democracy, where the courts have read the right to privacy in the right to life and liberty.

Will Cathcart, the global head of WhatsApp, wrote in The Washington Post on October 30, in the backdrop of the ongoing lawsuit by Facebook Inc against Israeli cyber security firm NSO, that “Governments and companies need to do more to protect vulnerable groups and individuals”. He was referring to spyware attacks, like the one that the messaging platform succumbed to from Pegasus, a malicious software developed by NSO. As first reported in this newspaper, WhatsApp has disclosed that a “not insignificant” number of Indian journalists, rights activists and lawyers were targeted using Pegasus. Cathcart is right — especially in placing the responsibility on both tech companies and governments. WhatsApp has often claimed that its end-to-end encryption makes it a safe and private way to communicate. That claim is now being contested. How it responds will signal whether its invocation of privacy as a first principle is more than a mere marketing ploy. The proceedings of the ongoing lawsuit will be closely watched, to track the culpabilities and complicities of the actors involved.

Earlier this year, NSO severed its contract with Saudi Arabia after accusations by a journalist that its software was used to hack his phone, which allowed Saudi agencies to track journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who was assassinated in Istanbul. The fact remains that in the digital age, companies will emerge and operate in the grey areas of the intersection between technology and security to make a profit. But inviolable as it is, national security must not be used as a shield by either governments or private players to justify the violation of fundamental rights.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments