scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Monday, July 04, 2022

Two-minute bans

Maggi alarm must nudge government towards greater alertness and stringent processes on food safety.

By: Express News Service |
Updated: June 4, 2015 1:03:02 am
Maggi Noodles, Maggi, Nestle, Maggi samples, Maggi tests, Maggi harmful, Maggi lead levels, Maggi MSG levels, Maggi banned Two charges have been made against Nestle, which produces Maggi. First, tests have found traces of lead that exceed the prescribed limit of 2.5 parts per million.

Maggi Noodles suddenly finds itself in hot water. The UP Food Safety and Drug Administration’s order to recall of 2,00,000 packets of Maggi has prompted the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India to initiate a widening probe across states, and already the Kerala government has prohibited its sale in 1,200 state-run outlets while Delhi has placed a 15-day ban on selling the product. The grim controversy acquired an unexpected dash of glamour when a Bihar court ordered FIRs against Bollywood film stars who endorsed Maggi. The merits of such a step are obviously questionable — for instance, why target the celebrity endorsers and not the publishers and broadcasters of the advertisements? It could lead to an endlessly unravelling thread of responsibility, taking down print and electronic media, websites and any other party involved in the production or publication of the ads. But that would not answer the very real concern about the safety of packaged food in India.

Two charges have been made against Nestle, which produces Maggi. First, tests have found traces of lead that exceed the prescribed limit of 2.5 parts per million. Second, samples contained quantities of monosodium glutamate (MSG), a substance proscribed in 50 food items, including “Pastas and noodles (only dried products)”. The presence of MSG is also not mentioned on Maggi packets, leaving Nestle open to charges of “misbranding”. As a wider array of packaged items comes under inspection, food companies have been nudged into action, with plans to step up communication with consumers and to increase transparency. It should not have taken a crisis to press them into accountability.

What the present controversy underlines most is the inadequacy of government mechanisms to ensure food safety. The avalanche of bans now imposed on Maggi has a ring of déjà vu. In 2003, after the Centre of Science and Environment found pesticide in fizzy drinks, a joint parliamentary committee was formed. It recommended standards for carbonated water but it took the health ministry three years to notify them. When even higher levels of pesticide were found in 2006, states imposed the same hasty bans on the sale of fizzy drinks. Government responses to the problem of food safety is sporadic and spurred by sudden alarms. Union Food Minister Ramvilas Paswan now promises a tough law to deal with the production of harmful food products and new commissions to replace consumer forums. Question is, will the urgency remain after the clamour has died down?

Best of Express Premium
UPSC Essentials: Key terms of the past weekPremium
ExplainSpeaking: Despite the fall, are Indian stock markets still overval...Premium
‘Peter Brook tried to destroy, recreate us. I wasn’t willing to be destro...Premium
In Gujarat, Covid crisis brings estranged couples together for second chancePremium

Express Explained Go beyond the news. Understand the headlines with our Explained stories

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement