State of the states

What states do or fail to do matters more for the economy today than the Union budget

By: Express News Service | Updated: February 29, 2016 12:08:18 am

budget, union budget, budget 2016, state budgets, union budget 2016, state budgets 2016, editorial, indian expressWhile all eyes today are on the Union budget — what it might do to bring back growth that people can feel and see — one mustn’t, amid all the hoopla surrounding this annual exercise, lose sight of where the real action would ultimately lie: The states. One of the Narendra Modi government’s truly game-changing initiatives last year was to pass on 42 per cent of Central tax revenues to the states, as against the earlier 32-per cent share. That single move, along with the outright scrapping or sharp cutbacks in most Centrally sponsored schemes, has shifted the onus for much of governmental spending to the states. They are the ones that are also in the direct line of fire now, whether it has to do with dealing with drought or handling violent agitations of Jats and Patidars demanding quotas in government jobs and educational institutions.

It is against this background that two recent developments merit closer attention. Last Tuesday saw auctions of state development loans, where the interest rates paid on 10-year borrowings ranged from 8.63 to 8.88 per cent. This represents a huge spread over not only current 10-year Indian government bond yields of 7.78 per cent, but also the 8.04 to 8.08 per cent cut-off rates for loans of the same tenure raised by the states in February 2015. The higher borrowing costs come even as there is a second elephant in the room in the form of the Seventh Pay Commission. Till now, all the focus was on what its implementation would do to the Centre’s fiscal deficit or ability to undertake capital expenditures that an investment-starved economy desperately needs. But we saw from last week’s railway budget how the salary and pension bill for the transport behemoth is slated to go up by nearly Rs 28,600 crore in 2016-17, largely courtesy the pay panel report. If the states were to follow suit — which they are bound to — the impact on their finances is probably yet to even be fully factored in. The worst scenario would be if much of the windfall for the states from high devolution goes towards payment of revised pay and pension scales, which is accompanied by rising borrowing costs (more so with the debts of power distribution companies getting converted into state government bonds under the Ujwal Discom Assurance Yojana or Uday), and the states not adequately filling the void created by reduced Central spending (especially in agriculture, health and education).

The simple point is that one shouldn’t look too much at the Union budget, beyond it laying the overall policy direction and signalling to investors on the course of reforms. But even there, it is the actions and initiatives being taken at the state-level that matter more today.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App