scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Tuesday, May 24, 2022

Says Salian

Listen to her. At stake is the state’s compact with its minorities, its promise to them of fairness and justice


Updated: June 26, 2015 5:45:04 am
Rohini Salian said she wants the NIA to officially denotify her from the case to which she was appointed in 2008, 'so that I am free to take up other cases, against the NIA, if need be'. Special public prosecutor in the Malegaon case, Rohini Salian.

The Malegaon blast case of 2008 marked a sobering and cautionary moment, even a turning point, in terror investigations in the country. Till then, such cases invariably featured young Muslim men as accused, and even though convictions were rare and the wheels of the criminal justice system turned slowly and in tortuous ways, they confirmed the pattern — and also the stereotype — of terror being a crime perpetrated by those belonging to one religion. But the Malegaon probe — by Maharashtra’s Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), led by Hemant Karkare, who was killed during 26/11 — pointed in a different direction. As first reported by this paper in October 2010, it led to alleged Hindu extremists based in Indore. A new phenomenon — some named it “Hindu terror” — seemed to be calling for serious attention and investigation. In asking for a resetting of the viewfinder, the Malegaon case also sent an important signal to the minority community and to all those with a stake in the rule of law in a diverse country. It was this: terror investigations would not be pre-determined by congealed prejudices, they would go where the evidence led them.

Now, with the special public prosecutor in the Malegaon case, Rohini Salian, revealing to this paper in an interview that over the past year, ever since “the new government came to power”, she has been under pressure from the National Investigation Agency (NIA), which took over from the ATS, to go “soft” in the case, some disquieting questions have been resurrected.

The government must answer these questions urgently. The Supreme Court, which has already intervened in this case — by decreeing that it will be tried in a special court with a specially appointed judge — must also heed the courageous special public prosecutor. At stake is the state’s compact with its minorities, its promise to them of fairness and justice. In Gujarat, for instance, it was the apex court that helped restore faith in the independence and impartiality of the justice system by reaching out to the victims of the 2002 communal violence, setting up a Special Investigation Team to probe certain cases, relocating others and directing retrials outside Gujarat.

In the Malegaon case, and in other cases involving “Hindu terror” — the Malegaon blasts 2006, Ajmer Sharif blast 2007, Mecca Masjid blast in Hyderabad 2007, Samjhauta Express attack 2007 and Modasa explosion 2008 — it is essential that justice must be done and that it must also be seen to be done. The India story, which in its best version is about it being a safe house for its minorities, depends on it.

Best of Express Premium

UPSC CSE Key – May 23, 2022: What you need to read todayPremium
Opinion: Can India turn Quad into an instrument to realise its significan...Premium
Presidential polls: For Congress, a prelude to battles aheadPremium
ExplainSpeaking: Fiscal in the time of monetary tighteningPremium

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement