scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Saturday, August 13, 2022

A little toxic

Loose poll talk on nuclear weapons always undermines a nuclear weapon power

By: Editorial |
Updated: April 23, 2019 12:14:25 am
Lok Sabha elections 2019, Narendra Modi, Modi on Balakot air strike, Modi on Abhinandan Varthaman, India Pakistan tension, India nuclear attack, India Pakistan nuclear attack PM Modi’s remarks have the potential of bringing the global spotlight on establishing a false equivalence between India and Pakistan, where both the countries are seen to be less than responsible with their nuclear arsenal.

National security has been a major focus of campaigning by the BJP this election season, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi taking the lead on the subject. He has held forth on military operations against Pakistan — the trans-LoC surgical strikes of 2016 and the recent air strikes at Balakot — under his watch. There has been discomfort about Modi’s campaign thrust among a section of military veterans, who have appealed to the President to keep the armed forces out of politics. There is, however, a counter-view that a political leadership which envisages and orders military action must be allowed to highlight its decisiveness to the electorate. After all, the armed forces are an instrument of the state and operate under the democratically-elected political leadership of the country.

Even if this contention is accepted as occurring in an acrimonious election campaign, Sunday’s speech by PM Modi in Rajasthan, where he invoked exchange of nuclear weapons with Pakistan, does cross a line. Modi said that “our newspapers also wrote, ‘Pakistan, too, has a nuclear weapon’. So what do we have, is it kept for Diwali?”. At one level, his statement merely reiterates India’s no-first-use doctrine of retaliation to a nuclear attack, something which has been public since India became a declared nuclear weapon state in 1998. But the manner and context of his invocation doesn’t serve any purpose for India. In fact, it has the potential of bringing the global spotlight on establishing a false equivalence between India and Pakistan, where both the countries are seen to be less than responsible with their nuclear arsenal.

Being seen as a responsible nuclear power has been the cornerstone of New Delhi’s position historically, which has given it global credence, leading India to be treated as a de facto nuclear state. A credible and transparent nuclear doctrine, backed by sober talk from the country’s political leadership, has earned India the respect which led to it being granted the exceptions by Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and signatory to the India-US nuclear deal. New Delhi’s quest for membership of NSG under the BJP government has also been based on the same arguments. Despite opposition by a strong anti-India nuclear lobby in the West, it has taken a lot of time and effort for New Delhi to reach this stage. To undermine these strategic gains for votes is not a terribly smart idea.

Subscriber Only Stories
Rushdie attack: Loud silence today echoes Parliament’s muted stand over y...Premium
What three letters, part of the Lahore Conspiracy Case, will be part of a...Premium
Seven decades since Independence, it’s high time our films reflecte...Premium
India still fails its women, 75 years after IndependencePremium

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 23-04-2019 at 12:14:23 am
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.

Featured Stories

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement