scorecardresearch
Follow Us:
Saturday, July 02, 2022

Back to foreign hand

Government wielding of FCRA as a blunt instrument makes it look insecure, shrinks vital space for NGOs, civil society

By: Editorial |
Updated: October 2, 2020 8:50:22 am
Goals and penaltiesBihar, of course, has come a long way from the time when elections were marked by booth capturing and other such acts of violence.

In the past eight years, since the twilight of the UPA regime and especially after the NDA assumed office at the Centre in 2014, the environment for civil society activism has seen a marked constriction. The government has raised the spectre of “western funders’ interests” — like the “foreign hand” of an earlier era — and wielded the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) like a blunt instrument to shrink the space for NGOs that campaign for environment protection, human rights advocacy groups, outfits that speak for the rights of marginalised sections or take up workers’ and farmers’ causes. On Tuesday, India joined Russia in an ignoble league — of nations from which the global human rights organisation, Amnesty International, has ceased operations. That Amnesty claims it was forced to shut shop because the Enforcement Directorate has frozen its accounts while the Union Ministry of Home Affairs accuses the outfit of financial impropriety only speaks of the acute trust deficit between civil society groups and the government.

The FCRA is an Emergency-era law — in its 1976 avatar, it was used to “regulate” foreign funding of political parties, electoral candidates, judges, newspaper publishers, cartoonists. In 2010, the ambit of the law was expanded to include “any organisation of political nature”. This definition — embracing an array of groups, including trade unions, women’s and civil rights outfits, farmers’ groups, even youth forums — allowed the government to scrutinise any foreign-funded organisation that could be critical of it. In 2012, at least three NGOs lost their licence in the wake of the protest against the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant. Then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s criticism that foreign-funded NGOs are “not fully appreciative of the country’s development challenges,” has taken on a sharper edge after the NDA assumed office. Armed with changes in the FCRA law — an amendment in 2016 made it incumbent on NGOs to renew FCRA licence every five years, it was permanent earlier — and by deploying the false binaries of development vs environment, civil rights vs national interest, the Centre has increased its stranglehold on civil society activism. At least 10,000 NGOs have, reportedly, lost their licence. Now, changes introduced to the law last week place further restrictions on the use of foreign funds by non-profits.

Their involvement in grass roots activities means NGOs can raise the uncomfortable questions, hold government to account, enforce corporate responsibility. The government needs to engage with civil society groups — not label them as opponents or disruptors.

Best of Express Premium
UPSC Essentials: Weekly news express — PGII to POEMPremium
Women’s emancipation or population control? Why abortion was legalised in...Premium
Udaipur killing on video | ‘Do something spectacular’: Man from Pak told ...Premium
In village of fauji dreams, second thoughts, insecurity over AgnipathPremium

UPSC KEY Have you seen our section dedicated to helping USPC aspirants decode daily news in the context of their exams?

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement