Follow Us:
Thursday, August 11, 2022

Bonfire of justice

Without police reforms, Gujarat’s proposed counter-terror law will, once more, institutionalise persistent abuses.

By: Express News Service |
Updated: September 28, 2015 12:12:16 am

Pranab Mukherjee has become the third president whose consent has been sought for Gujarat’s new counter-terrorism law — in its latest variant, named the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Bill (GCTOC). His predecessors, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam and Pratibha Patil, had rejected earlier bills. This time, it has the backing of the Union home ministry. The contentious features of the proposed law are well-known: It allows for electronically recorded confessional statements, if made to a superintendent of police, to be admitted in evidence; extends police custody to 180 days; and makes bail extremely hard to obtain. Gujarat had complained — not without reason — that the earlier denial of presidential assent had been politically motivated, noting that Congress governments had passed similar legislation in Maharashtra and Karnataka.

Yet, three wrongs don’t make a right. The reasons for concern are rooted in the history of the mercifully repealed mother legislation — the notorious Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). TADA was widely abused: Gujarat, with no terrorism problem, initiated 19,000 of the 67,000-odd cases, using it with equal enthusiasm against bootleggers, small-time criminals, and the completely innocent. Also, 80 per cent of TADA cases were registered against Muslims, suggesting flagrant communal bias. Besides, there was compelling evidence of confessions being coerced, often through torture. It achieved little — the late Rajesh Pilot, then internal security minister, admitted that, between 1985 and 1994, just 8,000 of 67,000 TADA cases went to trial, and just 725 people were convicted. Maharashtra’s Control of Organised Crime Act, too, has engendered exactly this kind of abuses.

A real debate is needed on the criminal justice tools India has to deal with terrorism. India’s laws weren’t designed to deal with situations where civil institutions collapsed in the face of insurgencies — as seen in Punjab, Chhattisgarh and the Northeast. Moreover, nation-states have had to introduce new laws not dissimilar to the GCTOC to deal with the challenges of transnational terrorism, carried out by skilled personnel trained to defeat law-enforcement. Elsewhere, these legal instruments were introduced along with substantial enhancement in police investigative capacity — and, critically, police accountability. Indian lawmakers have done next to nothing to bring police forces out of the colonial era. In the absence of police capacity-building, brutality remains the principal investigative tool. Laws like the GCTOC institutionalise this. Their outcome will be a bonfire of justice — the cornerstone on which our republic rests.

Subscriber Only Stories
Why Nitish Kumar felt the absence of Sushil Modi, ‘Jaitley channel’Premium
RSS shake-up for BJP: Why and where allPremium
Indian Monsoon 2022 Live Updates: 2 dead as heavy rains lash Himachal; 3 ...Premium
Delhi Confidential: Shashi Tharoor to receive Legion Of Honour, France&#8...Premium

📣 Join our Telegram channel (The Indian Express) for the latest news and updates

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App.

  • Newsguard
  • The Indian Express website has been rated GREEN for its credibility and trustworthiness by Newsguard, a global service that rates news sources for their journalistic standards.
  • Newsguard
First published on: 28-09-2015 at 12:12:13 am
0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by

Featured Stories