Follow Us:
Saturday, December 14, 2019

After Gurdaspur

It is important for the PM to shut his ears to the tweets of the hawks, and stay the course on Pakistan.

By: Express News Service | Published: July 28, 2015 3:53:47 am
gurdaspur terror attack, gurdaspur terror attack coverage, gurdaspur attack DD news, DD news gurdaspur attack, gurdaspur terror attack news coverage, gurdaspur attack news coverage, gurdaspur terrorist attack, punjab terror attack, Dinanagar terror attack, Dinanagar terrorist attack, Punjab gurdaspur attack, gurdaspur terror attack, terror attack in punjab, punjab attack, nation news, India news Army jawans at the encounter site, Monday. (Source: Express photo by Rana Simranjit Singh)

Less than four weeks after Prime Minister Narendra Modi initiated his breakthrough dialogue with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, his Pakistan policy is facing its first test by fire. Monday’s terrorist attack in Punjab, the first of its kind by Pakistan-based jihadists, has lent weight to hardliners inside and outside government who are critical of the prime minister’s decision to resume talks. Home Minister Rajnath Singh, voicing their sentiments, has said that while India wants peace, it cannot be “at the cost of national honour”. It is true, as hardliners point out, that Pakistan’s military-led establishment continues to nurture groups responsible for attacks like these. Yet, to terminate the dialogue process will be precisely the wrong move. It is important for the prime minister to shut his ears to the tweets of the hawks, and stay the course.

The reasons for continuing to engage Pakistan diplomatically are compelling. First, the absence of diplomatic engagement means there is that much less space for reflection at moments of crisis — raising the risks of miscalculation or accidents leading the two countries into a conflict neither can afford. For nuclear-armed nation states, dialogue is all the more important. The United States and Soviet Union, after all, continued to engage diplomatically even while waging proxy wars across the globe. Second, the India-Pakistan diplomatic engagement has, since its origins in the 2001-02 crisis, yielded significant security gains. From a situation where thousands of civilians and soldiers died in Jammu and Kashmir every year, fatalities are now down to barely over two-digit levels. Ever since the 26/11 attacks, Pakistan has, in addition, been forced by US pressure to rein in the Lashkar-e-Toiba; as a result, India is seeing historically low levels of terrorist violence. Third, calling off dialogue will not make India any more secure. After all, largescale terrorist attacks took place even in 2002, when the two countries were on the edge of war.

Modi’s government clearly understands the case for dialogue. Like his predecessors, though, the prime minister faces a conundrum: How to compel Pakistan to act against terrorists targeting India, while ensuring that the two countries do not lurch towards a confrontation? The sad truth is that there is no simple answer. Part of the answer clearly lies in enhancing India’s defensive counter-terrorism capacities, a painstaking process of police and intelligence capacity-building successive governments have shown little interest in. It is also important for political leaders to be transparent about the aims — and the limitations — of the dialogue process. Talking to Pakistan won’t end terrorism. But walking away from the dialogue table will leave the country less safe, not more.

For all the latest Opinion News, download Indian Express App

0 Comment(s) *
* The moderation of comments is automated and not cleared manually by indianexpress.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement