In colonial America,conventional wisdom held that women could not get pregnant unless they enjoyed the sex. Thank you,Representative Todd Akin of Missouri! Without you,we might have been condemned to spend today reinvestigating the Congressional Budget Office Medicare cost projections.
Akin,a US Senate nominee,has a reputation for,shall we say,thinking outside the box. In very few words,Akin managed to make three points. One was that rape victims cant get pregnant. This theory goes back to our forefathers,who believed that in order for our foremothers to conceive,the womb must be in a state of delight.
The idea never entirely faded away,possibly because it reflects so well on male lovemaking prowess. Since Akins debacle,weve learned that a former member of Congress once told the House Appropriations Committee that when people are truly raped,the juices dont flow,the body functions dont work and they dont get pregnant. And that James Leon Holmes,a federal judge currently hearing cases in Arkansas,once said that concern for rape victims is a red herring because conceptions from rape occur with approximately the same frequency as snowfall in Miami. This line of thinking is also familiar to David Wiley,a professor of health education at Texas State University who co-authored a study on what Texas school districts were actually teaching their students in sex education classes. (He was inspired,he said,when a sincere male student asked aloud,What is my risk for cervical cancer? ) Searching through the websites of groups that were providing programme material to the districts,Wiley found one that announced: If the woman is dry,the sperm will die.
So the first part of Akins comment is not the product of his unique imagination. Its still being repeated all over the country,perhaps out of veneration for the thoughts of the founding fathers. Part two was Akins mention of legitimate rape. This is the piece that had every mainstream Republican honcho in the country calling on Akin to drop out of the race. Karl Rove pulled the plug on his money. Paul Ryan reportedly got on the phone and begged Akin to go away for the good of the team.
But its the third point in Akins comment thats really important for this election. Before he got sidetracked into colonial-era biology,the veteran House member was trying to explain why he opposes abortion even in the case of rape. But lets assume that maybe that didnt work or something, Akin said,referring to the miraculous female shutdown mechanism that hed discovered. The rapist,he continued,should be punished,but not the child.
This is a perfectly consistent theological doctrine. If you believe that every fertilised egg is a human being,with the same sacred rights as a newborn baby,then,obviously,you are not going to want it to be aborted,no matter how it came into the world. Politicians who say they oppose all abortions are making perfect sense,except for the part where they try to impose their doctrinal beliefs on the vast majority of the country,which does not share that particular religious conviction. Its the abortion-except-for-rape-and-incest position that doesnt compute. Rape victims,yes,but not a 14-year-old who was impregnated by her 15-year-old boyfriend? The impoverished mother of six kids whose birth control method failed?
Maybe Akins real sin is that he exposed the phoniness of the rape-and-incest exception,which is just an attempt to make radical extremism look moderate. That and the theory of the delighted womb. Gail Collins