This is an archive article published on July 7, 2021
Premium

Who is guilty — Stan Swamy or those who kept him behind bars?

Alok Rai writes: The impunity of the state and its agents in destroying lives at will must be reined in. It cannot be legitimised by any electoral ‘mandate’.

In this Aug 28, 2018 file photo, civil rights activist Father Stan Swamy (PTI)In this Aug 28, 2018 file photo, civil rights activist Father Stan Swamy (PTI)
Written by: Alok Rai
7 min readJul 7, 2021 08:22 AM IST First published on: Jul 7, 2021 at 03:21 AM IST

Ah, so the sly old seditionist has slipped away. On Monday afternoon, Father Stan Swamy died in state custody. But the canny state, which had recognised that he intended to use a sippy cup as a terrorist device, and so took its time giving it to him, that state can surely claim that this was no ordinary death. It was a seditionist act. They will stop at nothing, these dangerous Urban Naxals. They will do anything to malign the noble state.

First, there were all the people who were dying of the virus, dying on hospital floors, dying on city pavements, bringing the fair name of the country into disrepute. But there were proper “nationalists” around who sought to prevent the spectacle of the burning pyres, the car park cremations, from being photographed and becoming public knowledge. And now Stan Swamy’s gone and died. Surely he knew that dying like this will be showing the country in a bad light. And, this is my case, he knew it! He is on record as having said that it will not be long now — to the court that denied him permission to return to Jharkhand. Even if the state did not have evidence of sedition earlier, surely they have it now. Stan Swamy’s death was a seditionist act! Guilty as charged — though they might not, yet, have charged him with the “crime” of dying in state custody.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments